POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofLabor →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Michigan Senate Bill 436 Restores Right-to-Work Provisions

Original title: Labor: collective bargaining; right to work; restore.

Last action · June 24, 2025: REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONSSponsors: Thomas Albert and 8 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Senate Bill 436 amends the state labor mediation act to prohibit employers and labor organizations from requiring employees to join a union or pay dues as a condition of employment, establishing civil fines for violations and granting the court of appeals exclusive jurisdiction over validity challenges.

Why it matters

Changes employment conditions across Michigan by prohibiting compulsory union dues or membership requirements, allowing workers to decline union support without losing their jobs while subjecting violators to $500 civil fines and private lawsuits.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Employees

Employees cannot be required to join a labor organization or pay dues, fees, or assessments as a condition of employment, and may sue for damages if violations occur.

Directly affected

Employers

Employers are prohibited from entering into collective bargaining agreements that require employees to pay dues or service fees as a condition of employment.

Directly affected

Labor organizations

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an employer require me to pay union dues as a condition of keeping my job under this bill?
No. The bill explicitly prohibits requiring an individual to pay dues, fees, or assessments to a labor organization as a condition of obtaining or continuing employment.
What happens if an employer or labor organization violates these new rules?
Violators are subject to a civil fine of not more than $500.00, and individuals who suffer injury can bring a civil action for damages and injunctive relief, including court costs and reasonable attorney fees.
Which court handles lawsuits challenging the validity of these rules?
The court of appeals has exclusive original jurisdiction over any action challenging the validity of the provisions and must hear the action in an expedited manner.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jun 24, 2025SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
  2. Jun 24, 2025SenateIntroduced
    INTRODUCED BY SENATOR THOMAS ALBERT

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Restoration of Right-to-Work Rules

The bill modifies the 1939 labor mediation act to prohibit compulsory union fees and membership requirements as conditions of employment.

Connected Entities

Aric Nesbitt, Roger Hauck, Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity and 8 more
PersonAric Nesbitt“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonRoger Hauck“Cosponsor”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Labor and Economic Opportunity“State department receiving appropriation for fiscal year 2022-2023”Map →
PersonJohn Damoose“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonRick Outman“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonMichael Webber“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonJonathan Lindsey“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonLana Theis“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonThomas Albert“Bill sponsor”Map →
PersonJoseph N. Bellino Jr.“Cosponsor”Map →
OrganizationEmployment Relations Commission“Commission created by section 3”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record