POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing on COVID-19 Origins and Future Outbreak Investigation

Original title: PRINCIPLES FOR OUTBREAK INVESTIGATION: COVID-19 AND FUTURE INFECTIOUS DISEASES

Record date · January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript of a July 14, 2021, House Subcommittee hearing focused on establishing scientific principles for investigating the origins of COVID-19 and preparing for future infectious disease outbreaks. It includes testimony from medical and scientific experts and records various documents submitted by committee members regarding the investigation of SARS-CoV-2 origins.

Why it matters

The hearing documents the official congressional record regarding the scientific debate and investigative strategies for identifying the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, which informs future federal public health policy and research oversight.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Public Health Researchers

The hearing discusses the standards and principles that may guide future infectious disease research and investigation protocols.

Directly affected

Federal Government Agencies

The committee's oversight activities influence the direction and focus of federal funding and investigative priorities regarding pandemic origins.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on July 14, 2021, by the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight.
  • The primary focus was establishing principles for investigating the origins of COVID-19 and future infectious diseases.
  • Four expert witnesses provided oral and written testimony regarding infectious disease research and investigation.
  • The record includes post-hearing responses from witnesses to questions posed by committee members.
Show all 7 facts
  • Representative Bill Posey submitted multiple documents into the record calling for a full international forensic investigation into the origins of COVID-19.
  • The record includes materials discussing the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 arising from laboratory research programs.
  • The hearing transcript is cataloged as Serial No. 117-24.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to discuss scientific principles for investigating the origins of COVID-19 and to improve preparedness for future infectious disease outbreaks.
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses included Dr. David Relman (Stanford), Dr. Stanley Perlman (University of Iowa), Dr. Connie Price (Denver Health), and Dr. Suzan Murray (Smithsonian).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Forensic Investigation

The hearing record highlights a significant push by committee members to formalize international forensic investigation standards for pandemic origins.

Connected Entities

Suzan Murray, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, Bill Foster and 4 more
PersonSuzan Murray“Witness, Smithsonian National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute”Map →
OrganizationCommittee on Science, Space, and Technology“House committee overseeing the hearing”Map →
PersonBill Foster“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight”Map →
PersonDavid Relman“Witness, Stanford University School of Medicine”Map →
PersonConnie Price“Witness, Denver Health”Map →
PersonJay Obernolte“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
PersonStanley Perlman“Witness, University of Iowa”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record