FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on 'Sue and Settle' Regulatory Agreements

Original title: EXAMINING `SUE AND SETTLE' AGREEMENTS: PART I

January 1, 2017

regulatory policy sue and settle administrative law government transparency congressional oversight

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing investigates how federal agencies resolve lawsuits through private settlements, which can bypass standard public notice and comment requirements, potentially impacting federal regulations and agency priorities.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Federal Agencies

Agencies are the primary parties entering into these settlement agreements, which dictate their future regulatory actions.

Private Litigants

These groups initiate the lawsuits that lead to the settlement agreements with federal agencies.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a joint House subcommittee hearing held on May 24, 2017, to examine the practice of '' agreements. The hearing explores concerns regarding transparency and the regulatory process when federal agencies settle lawsuits outside of standard administrative procedures.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a 'sue and settle' agreement?

It refers to a situation where a federal agency settles a lawsuit brought against it by a private party, often resulting in the agency agreeing to take specific regulatory actions without going through the standard public notice and comment process.

Why is Congress investigating this?

The committee is concerned that these agreements lack transparency and may bypass congressional intent and the standard regulatory framework established by the Administrative Procedures Act.

Key Facts

The hearing was held on May 24, 2017, in the Rayburn Office Building.
The hearing was a joint session of the Subcommittee on the Interior, Energy, and Environment and the Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Affairs.
The primary subject is 'sue and settle' agreements, where federal agencies settle lawsuits behind closed doors.
The committee asserts that these agreements often occur outside the regulatory framework of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).
The hearing aims to examine the impact of these agreements and discuss potential legislative or procedural solutions.
Four witnesses provided testimony: William Kovacs, Darcy Helmick, Justin Pidot, and Kent Holsinger.

Why It Matters

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Regulatory Transparency

The hearing highlights a specific 2017 legislative effort to increase oversight of agency settlement practices.

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

Connected Entities

personDarcy Helmick“Witness, Simplot Livestock Co.”Map →

personBlake Farenthold“Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Interior, Energy, and Environment”Map →

organizationCommittee on Oversight and Government Reform“House committee overseeing the hearing”Map →

personWilliam Kovacs“Witness, U.S. Chamber of Commerce”Map →

personKent Holsinger“Witness, Holsinger Law, LLC”Map →

personGary Palmer“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Affairs”Map →

personJustin Pidot“Witness, University of Denver Sturm College of Law”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance65
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy50
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment10
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz20
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools