POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofEPA
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Senate Hearing on EPA Fiscal Year 2023 Budget

Original title: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023

January 1, 2021

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing sets the stage for how the EPA will allocate federal funds for water infrastructure, toxic chemical regulation, and climate programs, directly impacting the availability of federal grants for local environmental projects.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Underserved communities

These communities are the focus of new efforts to distribute water infrastructure funding without requiring prohibitive matching funds.

EPA staff

The agency is operating with a workforce reduced by 3,000 positions since 2010, impacting its capacity to manage new responsibilities.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2021.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Subcommittee on Appropriations held a hearing to review the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) budget request for fiscal year 2023. Senators and EPA officials discussed funding priorities, including climate change initiatives, programs, and the implementation of $55-60 billion in water and infrastructure projects.

Key Facts

  • The EPA's workforce is currently down by nearly 3,000 staff members compared to 2010 levels.
  • The fiscal year 2022 budget provided $100 million for the EPA's Environmental Justice Program.
  • The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law provides over $55 billion for water infrastructure and Superfund cleanups.
  • The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act includes $50 billion for water infrastructure and $5 billion for contaminated site cleanups.
  • The EPA has committed to banning the most common form of asbestos.
  • The subcommittee hearing took place on May 18, 2022, to review the fiscal year 2023 budget request.

Why It Matters

This hearing sets the stage for how the EPA will allocate federal funds for water infrastructure, toxic chemical regulation, and climate programs, directly impacting the availability of federal grants for local environmental projects.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much funding is available for water infrastructure?
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law provides approximately $50 billion for water infrastructure improvements.
Is the EPA planning to ban asbestos?
The EPA has made a commitment to ban the most common form of asbestos, though some senators are calling for a total ban on all forms.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES

on behalf of BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY

VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES

on behalf of WATER AND SEWER DISTRIBUTORS OF AMERICA

VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES

on behalf of EJ WATER COOPERATIVE, INC.

LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES, LLC

on behalf of UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS

HARO SOLUTIONS LLC

on behalf of COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP

on behalf of POLK COUNTY

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Workforce Capacity Gap

The EPA is managing significantly expanded responsibilities with a workforce that has shrunk by 3,000 people since 2010.

Connected Entities

personDavid BloomChief Financial Officer of the EPAMap →
personLisa MurkowskiRanking Member of the Senate Subcommittee on AppropriationsMap →
personMichael ReganAdministrator of the Environmental Protection AgencyMap →
organizationEnvironmental Protection AgencyFederal agency under reviewMap →
personJeff MerkleyChairman of the Senate Subcommittee on AppropriationsMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record