POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Montana SB 202 authorizes appointment of benefits custodians for minors and incompetent persons in workers' compensation cases

Original title: Revise laws regarding receipt of workers' compensation benefits on behalf of others

Last action · May 23, 2025: (S) Died in ProcessSponsor: Laura Smith

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

Revise laws regarding receipt of workers' compensation benefits on behalf of others

Why it matters

The change establishes a formal mechanism for third-party custodians to manage and receive workers' compensation payments for minors and incapacitated individuals, altering who may legally collect and oversee these funds.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Minor children and incompetent persons

Their workers' compensation payments may now be received and managed by an appointed benefits custodian.

Directly affected

Insurers and employers

Written receipts from an appointed benefits custodian acquit them of further liability for the payment.

Key Facts

  • A payment due to a child under 18 or an incompetent person may be made to a benefits custodian, parent, or appointed guardian.
  • A written receipt from a benefits custodian acquits the employer, insurer, or department of further liability.
  • A benefits custodian is defined as a person appointed by the workers' compensation judge to pursue benefits or receive payments for a minor or incompetent person.
  • Claimants, insurers, or the uninsured employers' fund may petition the workers' compensation judge for the appointment of a benefits custodian.
Show all 6 facts
  • Parties are not required to satisfy standard dispute resolution requirements before petitioning for a benefits custodian.
  • The workers' compensation judge has the jurisdiction to appoint and terminate the appointment of a benefits custodian.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can be appointed as a benefits custodian?
A is a person appointed by the workers' compensation judge to pursue benefits or receive payments on behalf of a child under 18 years of age or a person adjudged incompetent.
Do parties need to go through dispute resolution before asking for a benefits custodian?
No, a party is not required to satisfy the dispute resolution requirements provided in the chapter prior to petitioning for a .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

19 actions
  1. May 23, 2025Senate
    (S) Died in Process
  2. Mar 12, 2025Senate
    (S) Missed Deadline for General Bill Transmittal
  3. Mar 1, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Tabled in Committee
  4. Feb 24, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Printed
  5. Feb 24, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Unsigned
  6. Feb 21, 2025Senate
    (S) Hearing
Show 13 earlier actions
  1. Feb 20, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Received
  2. Feb 13, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Requested
  3. Feb 13, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Referred to Committee
  4. Jan 23, 2025Senate
    (S) 1st Reading
  5. Jan 22, 2025SenateIntroduced
    (S) Introduced
  6. Jan 22, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Delivered to Requester
  7. Jan 14, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Ready for Delivery
  8. Jan 14, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Assembly
  9. Jan 13, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Final Drafter Review
  10. Jan 13, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Input/Proofing
  11. Jan 8, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Edit
  12. Jan 8, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Legal Review
  13. Dec 11, 2024House
    (LC) Drafter Assigned

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Laura Smith, C. Neumann
PersonLaura Smith“Primary sponsor of SB 202”Map →
PersonC. Neumann“Co-sponsor of SB 202”Map →

Sources

Open source document

bills.legmt.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 35)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record