2016 Budget Oversight Hearings for Interior and Environmental Agencies
January 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This document serves as the official record for the congressional review process that determines the annual funding levels and operational priorities for major federal land and environmental management agencies.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Forest Service
The agency's budget and operational priorities are subject to congressional oversight and funding decisions.
National Park Service
The agency's budget and operational priorities are subject to congressional oversight and funding decisions.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The document covers the 2016 budget oversight hearings for the House Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies.
- The U.S. Forest Service budget hearing begins on page 1.
- The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service budget hearing begins on page 77.
- The National Park Service budget hearing begins on page 159.
- The Bureau of Land Management budget hearing begins on page 207.
- The subcommittee is chaired by Ken Calvert of California.
Why It Matters
This document serves as the official record for the congressional review process that determines the annual funding levels and operational priorities for major federal land and environmental management agencies.
Frequently Asked Questions
What agencies were reviewed in these hearings?
Where can I find the specific testimony for these agencies?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Standardized Oversight Structure
The document demonstrates a highly structured, recurring oversight process where four major land-management agencies are reviewed sequentially within a single subcommittee session.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools