POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Senate Hearing on U.S. Visa Program Security

Original title: THE SECURITY OF U.S. VISA PROGRAMS

Record date · January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript of a 2016 Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing. The committee examined how federal agencies coordinate to secure U.S. visa programs and address potential vulnerabilities, such as s and security gaps.

Why it matters

The hearing evaluates the effectiveness of inter-agency cooperation between the State Department, USCIS, and ICE in managing visa security to prevent national security threats.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

International travelers and visa applicants

Changes to visa security protocols directly impact the processing and requirements for individuals seeking entry into the U.S.

Directly affected

Federal immigration agencies

The agencies are subject to congressional oversight regarding their coordination and security procedures.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on March 15, 2016, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  • The committee focused on inter-agency coordination between the State Department, USCIS, and ICE.
  • Chairman Johnson identified visa overstays and student visa vulnerabilities as primary security concerns.
  • The hearing examined the post-9/11 restructuring of immigration agencies into the Department of Homeland Security.
Show all 6 facts
  • Witnesses included senior officials from the State Department, USCIS, ICE, and the DHS Inspector General.
  • The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) submitted a statement for the record.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the main goal of this hearing?
To determine if federal agencies like the State Department, USCIS, and ICE are effectively working together to secure U.S. visa programs.
Who testified at the hearing?
Officials from the State Department, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the for the Department of Homeland Security.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

A STREET STRATEGIES

on behalf of National Association of Convenience Stores

2026

FUEL/GAS/OILBANKINGTOBACCOTAXATION/INTERNAL REVENUE CODE

“Issues relating to renewable fuels and energy policy Issues relating to UST regulations Issues relating to renewable fuels standard implementation Issues relating to retailer liability associated with selling alternative and renewable fuels Issues relating to the gasoline and diesel fuel excise tax Issues relating to Biodiesel Blenders' Tax Credit Issues relating to the Alternative Fuel Vehicle Refueling Property tax credit Issues relating to Gas prices and fuel markets, price gouging E15 RVP waiver”

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

121 Strategies & Government Relations

on behalf of Secure ID Coalition

2016

CONSUMER ISSUES/SAFETY/PRODUCTSHEALTH ISSUESFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/INVESTMENTS/SECMEDICARE/MEDICAID

“Protection of consumer personal identifiable information; Identity theft; Medical identity theft; protection of personal health information; EMV - chip card payment technology platform transition; e-Authentication; mobile payment; data breach protection; health data breach protection; multi-factor authentication - eliminating usernames and passwords.”

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

121 Strategies & Government Relations

on behalf of Secure ID Coalition

2016

CONSUMER ISSUES/SAFETY/PRODUCTSHEALTH ISSUESFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/INVESTMENTS/SECMEDICARE/MEDICAID

“Protection of consumer personal identifiable information; Identity theft; Medical identity theft; protection of personal health information; EMV - chip card payment technology platform transition; e-Authentication; mobile payment; data breach protection; health data breach protection; multi-factor authentication - eliminating usernames and passwords.”

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

121 Strategies & Government Relations

on behalf of Gemalto, Inc.

2016

CONSUMER ISSUES/SAFETY/PRODUCTSHEALTH ISSUESMEDICARE/MEDICAIDFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/INVESTMENTS/SEC

“Financial services data breach; Financial Services Credit & Debit Card Transition to EMV chip based cards, Protection of consumer personally identifiable information; Healthcare data breach; Medical identity theft; Healthcare fraud, waste and abuse.”

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

121 Strategies & Government Relations

on behalf of Secure ID Coalition

2016

CONSUMER ISSUES/SAFETY/PRODUCTSHEALTH ISSUESFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/INVESTMENTS/SECMEDICARE/MEDICAID

“Protection of consumer personal identifiable information; Identity theft; Medical identity theft; protection of personal health information; EMV - chip card payment technology platform transition; e-Authentication; mobile payment; data breach protection; health data breach protection.”

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

121 Strategies & Government Relations

on behalf of Gemalto, Inc.

2016

CONSUMER ISSUES/SAFETY/PRODUCTSHEALTH ISSUESMEDICARE/MEDICAIDFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/INVESTMENTS/SEC

“Financial services data breach; Financial Services Credit & Debit Card Transition to EMV chip based cards, Protection of consumer personally identifiable information; Healthcare data breach; Medical identity theft; Healthcare fraud, waste and abuse.”

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

121 Strategies & Government Relations

on behalf of Secure ID Coalition

2016

CONSUMER ISSUES/SAFETY/PRODUCTSHEALTH ISSUESFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/INVESTMENTS/SECMEDICARE/MEDICAID

“Protection of consumer personal identifiable information; Identity theft; Medical identity theft; protection of personal health information; EMV payment tecnology platform transition; e-Authentication; mobile payment; data breach protection; health data breach protection.”

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

121 Strategies & Government Relations

on behalf of Secure ID Coalition

2015

CONSUMER ISSUES/SAFETY/PRODUCTSHEALTH ISSUESFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/INVESTMENTS/SECMEDICARE/MEDICAID

“Protection of consumer personal identifiable information; Identity theft; Medical identity theft; protection of personal health information; EMV (Europay, MasterCard, Visa)payment technology platform transition; e-Authentication; mobile payment; data breach protection; health data breach protection.”

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

121 Strategies & Government Relations

on behalf of Secure ID Coalition

2015

CONSUMER ISSUES/SAFETY/PRODUCTSHEALTH ISSUESFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/INVESTMENTS/SECMEDICARE/MEDICAID

“Protection of consumer personal identifiable information; Identity theft; Medical identity theft; protection of personal health information; EMV (Europay, MasterCard, Visa)payment technology platform transition; e-Authentication; mobile payment; data breach protection; health data breach protection.”

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

121 Strategies & Government Relations

on behalf of Secure ID Coalition

2015

CONSUMER ISSUES/SAFETY/PRODUCTSHEALTH ISSUESFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/INVESTMENTS/SECMEDICARE/MEDICAID

“Protection of consumer personal identifiable information; Identity theft; Medical identity theft; protection of personal health information; EMV (Europay, MasterCard, Visa)payment technology platform transition; e-Authentication; mobile payment; data breach protection; health data breach protection”

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Post-9/11 Agency Fragmentation

The hearing highlights the ongoing challenge of coordinating security missions across multiple agencies (State, USCIS, ICE) that were separated following the creation of the Department of Homeland Security.

Connected Entities

John Roth, Ron Johnson, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and 5 more
PersonJohn Roth“Inspector General, U.S. Department of Homeland Security”Map →
PersonRon Johnson“Chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs”Map →
OrganizationU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services“DHS agency involved in immigration processing”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of State“Responsible for visa issuance”Map →
OrganizationU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement“DHS agency involved in immigration enforcement”Map →
PersonSarah R. Saldana“Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement”Map →
PersonDavid Donahue“Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, U.S. Department of St”Map →
PersonLeon Rodriguez“Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record