The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Resolution to Remove U.S. Armed Forces from Venezuela
Last action · January 22, 2026: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.Sponsors: James McGovern and 126 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
This resolution directs the President to withdraw all U.S. Armed Forces from Venezuela unless Congress has specifically authorized their presence through a declaration of war or other military authorization.
The resolution invokes the War Powers Resolution to mandate the removal of military personnel from Venezuela, potentially ending current unauthorized military operations in that country.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
U.S. Armed Forces
Personnel currently stationed in Venezuela would be subject to removal under this resolution.
The President
The President is directed to execute the removal of forces unless specific authorization exists.
Key Facts
- The resolution directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from Venezuela.
- The mandate applies to any forces not explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization.
- The resolution is introduced under the authority of section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(c)).
- The resolution requires concurrence from the Senate to be fully enacted.
Show all 5 facts
- The resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 7, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this bill immediately remove all U.S. troops from Venezuela?
What is the War Powers Resolution?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Failed in the House.
Procedural history
12 actions- Jan 22, 2026HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Jan 22, 2026HouseOn agreeing to the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 215 - 215 (Roll no. 48).
- Jan 22, 2026HouseFloorFailed of passage/not agreed to in House On agreeing to the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 215 - 215 (Roll no. 48).
- Jan 22, 2026HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1334-1335)
- Jan 22, 2026HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Con.Res. 68, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Jan 22, 2026HouseThe previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
Show 6 earlier actions
- Jan 22, 2026HouseDEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Con. Res. 68.
- Jan 22, 2026HouseConsidered pursuant to a previous order. (consideration: CR H1317-1325; text: CR H1317)
- Jan 22, 2026HouseConsideration initiated pursuant to a previous order.
- Jan 21, 2026HouseORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Mast asked unanimous consent that it be in order at any time to consider H. Con. Res. 68 in the House if called up by the Chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs or his designee; that the concurrent resolution be considered as read; and that the previous question be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution to adoption without intervening motion except for one hour of debate equally divided among and controlled by Representative Mast of Florida, Representative Meeks of New York, and Representative McGovern of Massachusetts, or their respective designees. Agreed to without objection.
- Jan 7, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Jan 7, 2026HouseSubmitted in House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Total
427
- Yes
- 213
- No
- 214
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (427)
403 more members
Show 1 earlier roll call
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Total
431
- Yes
- 215
- No
- 215
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 1
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (1)
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 122 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment40Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz60Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
