Congressional Hearing on the Muslim Brotherhood
January 1, 2018
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing explored the potential for a formal U.S. government designation of the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization, which would impact U.S. foreign policy and international relations.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. State Department
The department is responsible for the potential designation of foreign terrorist organizations.
U.S. Treasury Department
The department may be involved in the implementation of sanctions or terror designations.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on July 11, 2018, by the Subcommittee on National Security.
- The primary topic was whether the Muslim Brotherhood should be designated as a foreign terrorist organization.
- The subcommittee discussed the history of the Muslim Brotherhood, founded in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna.
- The hearing included testimony from four expert witnesses regarding the organization's ideology and global activities.
- The chairman noted that the Trump administration was considering how to approach the terror designation of the group.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing explored the potential for a formal U.S. government designation of the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization, which would impact U.S. foreign policy and international relations.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Change in Executive Branch Stance
The chairman explicitly noted a shift from the Obama administration's policy toward the Muslim Brotherhood to the Trump administration's approach.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy85Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools