POLISCOPE
Back to feed
CALACCESS COUNTYlobbying

Lobbying Disclosure: Nielsen Merksamer for LA Metro (Q1 2000)

Original title: NIELSEN MERKSAMER PARRINELLO MUELLER & NAYLOR LLP lobbying for LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

June 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This document reveals how much public transit funding was spent on professional services during a three-month period to influence specific California state legislation.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

The agency is responsible for the expenditure of public funds for lobbying services.

Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP

The firm received payment for providing lobbying services to the transportation authority.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document discloses payments made by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority to the law firm Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP for the first quarter of 2000. It details the total amount paid and the specific legislative bills the firm monitored or influenced.

Key Facts

  • The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority paid $25,980 to the firm Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP for lobbying services.
  • The reporting period covers January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2000.
  • The payment amount includes compensation for services rendered during the 4th quarter of 1999.
  • The lobbying activity focused on three specific California Assembly Bills: AB 1612, AB 1765, and AB 1951.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this document?
It is a disclosure report showing how much a public agency spent on professional lobbyists during a specific quarter.
What bills were the lobbyists working on?
The firm was active regarding Assembly Bills 1612, 1765, and 1951.

Why It Matters

This document reveals how much public transit funding was spent on professional services during a three-month period to influence specific California state legislation.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

financial connection100% confidence

Delayed Payment Reporting

The report explicitly notes that the payment amount includes fees for services provided in the previous calendar year (Q4 1999).

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance30
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record