The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas adds carisoprodol, mifepristone, and misoprostol to Schedule IV controlled substances
Last action · July 18, 2025: FiledSponsor: Pat Curry
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
HB 125 designates carisoprodol, mifepristone, and misoprostol as under the Texas Controlled Substances Act, effective January 1, 2026.
The measure alters the legal classification and regulatory oversight of specific prescription drugs in Texas, applying new statutory rules to offenses committed on or after January 1, 2026.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Individuals and entities handling carisoprodol, mifepristone, or misoprostol
Their handling of these substances becomes subject to the regulatory rules governing Schedule IV controlled substances starting January 1, 2026.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which substances are added to Schedule IV under this bill?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
1 action- Jul 18, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 50)
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools