POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Michigan Senate Bill 601 Restricts Industrial Hemp Growing Locations and Imposes New Sales Recordkeeping Rules

Original title: Industrial Hemp: other; cross-references to industrial hemp research and development act within the industrial hemp growers act; amend.

Last action · December 17, 2025: referred to Committee on Regulatory ReformSponsors: Sam Singh and 4 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Industrial hemp growers are required to maintain specific sales records and are prohibited from growing hemp in dwellings under updated regulations. The legislation updates definitions, registration terms, and recordkeeping requirements while repealing a section of the existing industrial hemp growers act. These changes cannot take effect unless Senate Bill No. 599 is also enacted into law.

Why it matters

Industrial hemp cultivators and processors face new operational restrictions, mandatory recordkeeping rules for raw hemp sales, and a $250 late fee for registration renewals submitted after January 31, 2026.

Background
  • Senate Bill 601 is part of ongoing legislative updates in Michigan to regulate industrial hemp cultivation and processing under the Industrial Hemp Growers Act. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

industrial hemp growers

Growers must comply with updated registration timelines, location restrictions, and mandatory sales recordkeeping requirements.

Directly affected

processor-handlers

Processor-handlers purchasing raw industrial hemp must receive and be listed on the detailed records of sale provided by growers.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a grower submits a registration renewal after January 31?
The applicant must pay the standard registration fee along with a late fee of $250.00.
Are growers permitted to cultivate industrial hemp inside a residential home?
No, growers are explicitly prohibited from growing industrial hemp in a dwelling.
What information must be included when a grower sells raw industrial hemp?
The grower must provide a record of sale containing the buyer's name and license number, total weight, total sale price, date of sale, and the certified report of total delta-9-THC testing for each variety purchased.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

13 actions
  1. Dec 17, 2025HouseCommittee
    referred to Committee on Regulatory Reform
  2. Dec 17, 2025HouseIntroduced
    read a first time
  3. Dec 17, 2025House
    received on 12/17/2025
  4. Dec 16, 2025SenateFloor
    PASSED ROLL CALL # 341 YEAS 28 NAYS 7 EXCUSED 2 NOT VOTING 0
  5. Dec 9, 2025Senate
    PLACED ON IMMEDIATE PASSAGE
  6. Dec 9, 2025Senate
    RULES SUSPENDED
Show 7 earlier actions
  1. Dec 9, 2025Senate
    PLACED ON ORDER OF THIRD READING WITH SUBSTITUTE (S-1)
  2. Dec 9, 2025Senate
    SUBSTITUTE (S-1) CONCURRED IN
  3. Dec 9, 2025Senate
    REPORTED BY COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FAVORABLY WITH SUBSTITUTE (S-1)
  4. Dec 2, 2025SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE WITH SUBSTITUTE (S-1)
  5. Dec 2, 2025SenateCommittee
    REPORTED FAVORABLY WITH SUBSTITUTE (S-1) 11/13/2025
  6. Oct 2, 2025SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON REGULATORY AFFAIRS
  7. Oct 2, 2025SenateIntroduced
    INTRODUCED BY SENATOR SAM SINGH

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference100% confidence

Conditional Legislative Dependency

The bill explicitly links its enactment to the passage of Senate Bill No. 599.

Connected Entities

Sue Shink, Dayna Polehanki, department of agriculture and rural development and 5 more
PersonSue Shink“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 601”Map →
PersonDayna Polehanki“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 601”Map →
Organizationdepartment of agriculture and rural development“State department responsible for administering the industrial hemp program and r”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Drug Enforcement Administration“Federal agency referenced for compliance monitoring and regulatory testing facil”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Department of Agriculture“Federal department referenced in relation to farm and tract definitions”Map →
PersonSam Singh“Primary sponsor of Senate Bill 601”Map →
PersonRosemary Bayer“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 601”Map →
PersonJeremy Moss“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 601”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record