The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Lobbying Disclosure: Water Replenishment District of Southern California (Q1 2000)
Record date · June 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document discloses payments made by the Water Replenishment District of Southern California to the law firm Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP for the first quarter of 2000. It details the total amount paid and the specific state legislative bills the firm monitored or influenced.
This report tracks the expenditure of public funds by the Water Replenishment District of Southern California to influence state legislation, totaling $30,231.42 for the period.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Water Replenishment District of Southern California
The agency is responsible for the expenditure of public funds for lobbying services.
Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP
The firm received payment for providing lobbying services to the district.
Key Facts
- The Water Replenishment District of Southern California paid $30,231.42 for lobbying services between January 1, 2000, and March 31, 2000.
- The payments included compensation for services rendered during the 4th quarter of 1999.
- The lobbying firm monitored eight specific pieces of legislation: AB 1794, AB 1613, AB 1615, AB 1834, SB 1316, SB 1341, SB 1979, and SB 2134.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this document?
Does this payment cover only the first quarter of 2000?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Delayed Payment Reporting
The report explicitly states that the Q1 2000 payment included costs for the previous quarter (Q4 1999), indicating a lag in billing or reporting cycles.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.sos.ca.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance30How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
