POLISCOPE
Back to feed
CALACCESS COUNTYlobbying

Lobbying Disclosure: Water Replenishment District of Southern California (Q1 2000)

Original title: NIELSEN MERKSAMER PARRINELLO MUELLER & NAYLOR LLP lobbying for WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

June 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This report tracks the expenditure of public funds by the Water Replenishment District of Southern California to influence state legislation, totaling $30,231.42 for the period.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Water Replenishment District of Southern California

The agency is responsible for the expenditure of public funds for lobbying services.

Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP

The firm received payment for providing lobbying services to the district.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document discloses payments made by the Water Replenishment District of Southern California to the law firm Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP for the first quarter of 2000. It details the total amount paid and the specific state legislative bills the firm monitored or influenced.

Key Facts

  • The Water Replenishment District of Southern California paid $30,231.42 for lobbying services between January 1, 2000, and March 31, 2000.
  • The payments included compensation for services rendered during the 4th quarter of 1999.
  • The lobbying firm monitored eight specific pieces of legislation: AB 1794, AB 1613, AB 1615, AB 1834, SB 1316, SB 1341, SB 1979, and SB 2134.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this document?
This is a public disclosure report showing how much a public agency spent on professional services during a specific three-month period.
Does this payment cover only the first quarter of 2000?
No, the document notes that the payments were partially for services provided in the 4th quarter of 1999.

Why It Matters

This report tracks the expenditure of public funds by the Water Replenishment District of Southern California to influence state legislation, totaling $30,231.42 for the period.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

financial connection100% confidence

Delayed Payment Reporting

The report explicitly states that the Q1 2000 payment included costs for the previous quarter (Q4 1999), indicating a lag in billing or reporting cycles.

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance30
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record