POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Hearing on the Equal Rights Amendment (April 2019)

Original title: EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT

Record date · January 1, 2020

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript of a 2019 House Judiciary regarding the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). The hearing featured testimony from legal experts, state legislators, and advocates to discuss the potential impact and constitutional status of the proposed amendment.

Why it matters

The serves as a formal legislative record for the consideration of the Equal Rights Amendment, which proposes to constitutionally guarantee equal treatment under the law regardless of sex.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Women in the United States

The proposed amendment aims to establish constitutional protections regarding equal treatment under the law based on sex.

Directly affected

U.S. Congress

The committee is responsible for the legislative consideration and potential advancement of the constitutional amendment.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on April 30, 2019, in the Rayburn Office Building.
  • The hearing was convened by the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
  • The primary subject of the hearing was the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA).
  • Four witnesses provided testimony: Kathleen M. Sullivan, Elizabeth Price Foley, Senator Pat Spearman, and Patricia Arquette.
Show all 6 facts
  • The hearing included opening statements from Chairman Steve Cohen, Ranking Member Mike Johnson, and Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler.
  • The record includes various letters and statements submitted for the record by committee members.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of the Equal Rights Amendment?
According to the chair, the purpose is to guarantee that women are treated equally under the law.
Who testified at this hearing?
The witnesses were Kathleen M. Sullivan, Elizabeth Price Foley, Nevada State Senator Pat Spearman, and actor/advocate Patricia Arquette.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

ERA Legislative Activity

The hearing indicates a formal effort in the 116th Congress to revisit the constitutional status of the Equal Rights Amendment.

Connected Entities

Elizabeth Price Foley, Patricia Arquette, Steve Cohen and 4 more
PersonElizabeth Price Foley“Witness, Professor of Law at Florida International University”Map →
PersonPatricia Arquette“Witness, Actor and Advocate”Map →
PersonSteve Cohen“Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Libert”Map →
OrganizationHouse Committee on the Judiciary“Congressional committee overseeing the hearing”Map →
PersonKathleen M. Sullivan“Witness, Partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan”Map →
PersonPat Spearman“Witness, Nevada State Senator”Map →
PersonMike Johnson“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record