POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Resolution to Overturn CMS Marketplace Integrity Rule

Original title: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Marketplace Integrity and Affordability".

Last action · January 13, 2026: Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 52. Record Vote Number: 8.Sponsors: Mark Warner and 43 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This seeks to formally disapprove and invalidate a federal rule issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding the Affordable Care Act's Marketplace Integrity and Affordability standards.

Why it matters

If passed, this resolution would nullify a specific federal regulation (90 27074) governing health insurance marketplace operations, effectively preventing it from being enforced or having any legal effect.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

The agency's regulatory action is subject to nullification by this resolution.

Directly affected

Health Insurance Marketplace participants

The regulatory framework governing marketplace integrity and affordability would be altered if the rule is invalidated.

Key Facts

  • The resolution formally disapproves the CMS rule titled 'Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Marketplace Integrity and Affordability'.
  • The rule in question was published in the Federal Register on June 25, 2025 (90 Fed. Reg. 27074).
  • If enacted, the rule would have no force or effect under the Congressional Review Act.
  • The resolution was introduced in the Senate on September 30, 2025.
Show all 5 facts
  • The resolution is currently referred to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does it mean for Congress to 'disapprove' a rule?
Under the Congressional Review Act, Congress can pass a to overturn a federal agency's rule, preventing it from taking effect or remaining in force.
Does this resolution change the Affordable Care Act itself?
No, it specifically targets a regulatory rule issued by CMS regarding marketplace integrity, not the underlying law.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently on floor. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Passed.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Jan 13, 2026Senate
    Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 52. Record Vote Number: 8.
  2. Jan 13, 2026Senate
    Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (consideration: CR S147-157; text: CR S147)
  3. Dec 9, 2025Senate
    Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 293.
  4. Dec 9, 2025Senate
    Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
  5. Sep 30, 2025SenateCommittee
    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
  6. Sep 30, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced in Senate

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Outcome not reportedSenate1/13/2026Voteview

Total

99

Yes
47
No
52
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0

How they voted (99)

75 more members
Ted BuddRno
Catherine Cortez MastoDyes
John KennedyRno
Lisa Blunt RochesterDyes
Joni ErnstRno
Chris Van HollenDyes
Michael BennetDyes
Ted CruzRno
Tammy DuckworthDyes
Tom CottonRno
Dan SullivanRno
Tim ScottRno
Brian SchatzDyes
James JusticeRno
John CurtisRno
James RischRno
Deb FischerRno
Elizabeth WarrenDyes
Ron WydenDyes
Mike CrapoRno
Ron JohnsonRno
Tammy BaldwinDyes
Bill HagertyRno
Charles SchumerDyes
Jacky RosenDyes
Andy KimDyes
Thomas TillisRno
Kirsten GillibrandDyes
Todd YoungRno
Marsha BlackburnRno
Eric SchmittRno
Edward MarkeyDyes
Cory BookerDyes
Maria CantwellDyes
Katie BrittRno
James LankfordRno
Roger MarshallRno
Maggie HassanDyes
Mazie HironoDyes
John ReedDyes
Richard BlumenthalDyes
Alex PadillaDyes
John HoevenRno
Rick ScottRno
Angus KingIyes
Bernie MorenoRno
John BoozmanRno
Tim SheehyRno
Ben LujanDyes
Roger WickerRno
Markwayne MullinRno
Martin HeinrichDyes
John CornynRno
Mark WarnerDyes
Jon HustedRno
John FettermanDyes
Christopher CoonsDyes
Gary PetersDyes
Mark KellyDyes
Steve DainesRno
Jeanne ShaheenDyes
Cynthia LummisRno
Lisa MurkowskiRno
Shelley CapitoRno
Sheldon WhitehouseDyes
Elissa SlotkinDyes
Mitch McConnellRno
Peter WelchDyes
John HickenlooperDyes
Chuck GrassleyRno
Josh HawleyRno
Jeff MerkleyDyes
David McCormickRno
Rand PaulRno
Christopher MurphyDyes

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Legislative Pushback on CMS Rule

A large coalition of 42 senators has formally moved to block a CMS rule issued only three months prior, signaling significant legislative opposition to the agency's recent regulatory direction.

Connected Entities

Warner, Mark, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
PersonWarner, Mark“Lead sponsor of the resolution.”Map →
OrganizationCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services“The federal agency that issued the rule being challenged.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record