POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas bill authorizes all counties to establish drainage utilities, levy impact fees, and regulate land use for flood control

Original title: Relating to the authority of a county to establish drainage utilities, impose drainage fees, and regulate land use for the purpose of flood management.

Last action · August 20, 2025: Referred to Disaster Preparedness & FloodingSponsor: Erin Zwiener

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

Relating to the authority of a county to establish drainage utilities, impose drainage fees, and regulate land use for the purpose of flood management.

Why it matters

Property owners and developers in unincorporated areas face new county-level land-use restrictions, potential drainage utility fees, and s for new development aimed at flood management.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Counties

Counties gain new discretionary authority to adopt land-use regulations for flood control, establish drainage utility systems, and levy drainage impact fees.

Directly affected

Property owners and developers in unincorporated areas

Property owners and developers are subject to new county land-use standards, setback rules, landscaping requirements, and potential drainage utility and impact fees.

Directly affected

Municipalities

Municipalities retain supremacy over conflicting county regulations within their jurisdictions, and county drainage service areas cannot include municipal extraterritorial jurisdictions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a county ban all development in a floodplain under this bill?
No. The bill explicitly states that regulations and land-use rules may not prohibit all development in a floodplain or flood zone.
What happens if a county drainage rule conflicts with a city ordinance?
To the extent of a conflict between a county order and a municipal ordinance regulating the same conduct, the municipal ordinance or regulation prevails.
Which counties are allowed to impose storm-water and drainage impact fees?
The bill removes previous population restrictions, allowing any county (as well as eligible districts) to impose s for storm water, drainage, and flood control to accommodate new development.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Aug 20, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Disaster Preparedness & Flooding
  2. Aug 20, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  3. Aug 15, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Removal of Population Thresholds for Drainage Impact Fees

The bill expands storm-water impact fee authority from large counties (population 3.3 million or more) to all counties statewide.

Connected Entities

Erin Zwiener
PersonErin Zwiener“Bill author and sponsor in the House”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record