POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Utah law authorizes courts to appoint receivers and order divestment for public water system violators

Original title: Drinking Water Restructuring Amendments

Last action · March 25, 2026: Governor SignedSponsors: Carl Albrecht and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Utah authorizes courts to appoint s for public water system suppliers and require them to divest ownership to resolve Safe Drinking Water Act violations, effective May 6, 2026. The law also requires the director of the Division of Drinking Water to report related civil actions to legislative committees.

Why it matters

Public water system suppliers facing severe compliance failures can now have their management taken over by court-appointed s or be forced to sell their systems entirely.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

public water system suppliers

Suppliers face potential court-ordered receivership, mandatory divestment of ownership, and increased administrative or criminal penalties for non-compliance.

Directly affected

Division of Drinking Water

The division director is granted authority to bring civil actions for receivership or divestment and is required to report status updates to legislative committees.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When can a court appoint a receiver for a water system?
A court may appoint a if a violation poses a serious public health risk and the water supplier is unwilling or unable to implement corrective action.
What are the financial penalties for violating drinking water rules?
Penalties can reach up to $1,000 per day for smaller water systems and exactly $1,000 per day for systems serving more than 10,000 individuals, with carrying fines up to $5,000 per day.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

48 actions
  1. Mar 25, 2026Lieutenant Governor's office for filingEnrolled
    Governor Signed
  2. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ to Governor
  3. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
  4. Feb 20, 2026House
    House/ enrolled bill to Printing
  5. Feb 20, 2026Clerk of the House
    Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
  6. Feb 12, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Show 42 earlier actions
  1. Feb 12, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Bill Received from House for Enrolling
  2. Feb 10, 2026House
    House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
  3. Feb 10, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  4. Feb 10, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  5. Feb 10, 2026Senate
    Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
  6. Feb 10, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  7. Feb 10, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  8. Feb 10, 2026House
    House/ concurs with Senate amendment
  9. Feb 9, 2026House
    House/ placed on Concurrence Calendar
  10. Feb 9, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  11. Feb 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House with amendments
  12. Feb 6, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 3rd reading
  13. Feb 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 3rd reading
  14. Feb 5, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 2nd reading
  15. Feb 5, 2026Senate
    Senate/ uncircled
  16. Feb 5, 2026Senate
    Senate/ circled
  17. Feb 5, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  18. Feb 2, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0069S01
  19. Feb 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
  20. Feb 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ comm rpt/ substituted
  21. Jan 30, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  22. Jan 30, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Substitute Recommendation
  23. Jan 30, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0069S01
  24. Jan 30, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0069S01
  25. Jan 30, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0069S01
  26. Jan 27, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  27. Jan 23, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  28. Jan 22, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  29. Jan 22, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  30. Jan 22, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  31. Jan 22, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  32. Jan 20, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  33. Jan 20, 2026House
    House/ Rules to 3rd Reading Calendar
  34. Jan 20, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  35. Jan 20, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  36. Jan 14, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  37. Jan 14, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0069
  38. Jan 5, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0069
  39. Dec 22, 2025Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0069
  40. Dec 22, 2025Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0069
  41. Dec 22, 2025Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  42. Dec 22, 2025Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Outcome not reportedHouse2/10/2026Utah LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

House/ concurs with Senate amendment

Total

72

Yes
65
No
1
Present
0
Not voting
6
Abstain
0

How they voted (72)

48 more members
Logan MonsonParty not recordedyes
Jen Dailey-ProvostParty not recordedyes
Jason KyleParty not recordedyes
Casey SniderParty not recordedyes
Jill KofordParty not recordedyes
Doug OwensParty not recordedyes
Verona MaugaParty not recordedyes
Stephanie GriciusParty not recordedyes
Val PetersonParty not recordedyes
Ashlee MatthewsParty not recordedyes
Joseph ElisonParty not recordedyes
Angela RomeroParty not recordedyes
Tiara AuxierParty not recordedabsent
Jake SawyerParty not recordedyes
Katy HallParty not recordedyes
Cheryl ActonParty not recordedyes
Ray WardParty not recordedyes
Carl AlbrechtParty not recordedyes
Steve EliasonParty not recordedyes
Clint OkerlundParty not recordedyes
Ariel DefayParty not recordedyes
Karen PetersonParty not recordedyes
Doug FiefiaParty not recordedyes
Matt MacPhersonParty not recordedyes
Rex ShippParty not recordedyes
John ArthurParty not recordedyes
Mike KohlerParty not recordedabsent
Colin JackParty not recordedyes
Kay ChristoffersonParty not recordedyes
Ryan WilcoxParty not recordedabsent
Troy ShelleyParty not recordedyes
Walt BrooksParty not recordedyes
Sahara HayesParty not recordedyes
Mark StrongParty not recordedyes
Cal RobertsParty not recordedyes
Ken IvoryParty not recordedyes
Carol MossParty not recordedyes
Candice PierucciParty not recordedyes
Stephen WhyteParty not recordedyes
Mike PetersenParty not recordedyes
Tom PetersonParty not recordedyes
Jim DunniganParty not recordedyes
Lisa ShepherdParty not recordedyes
Nicholeen PeckParty not recordedyes
Cory MaloyParty not recordedyes
Karianne LisonbeeParty not recordedabsent
Jake FitisemanuParty not recordedyes
Neil WalterParty not recordedyes
Show 5 earlier roll calls
Motion succeededHouse1/22/2026Utah LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

House/ passed 3rd reading

Total

75

Yes
60
No
11
Present
0
Not voting
4
Abstain
0

How they voted (72)

48 more members
Christine WatkinsParty not recordedyes
Jake SawyerParty not recordedno
Stewart BarlowParty not recordedyes
Mike SchultzParty not recordedyes
Nicholeen PeckParty not recordedno
Kay ChristoffersonParty not recordedyes
Cal RobertsParty not recordedabsent
Walt BrooksParty not recordedyes
Hoang NguyenParty not recordedyes
Neil WalterParty not recordedyes
Lisa ShepherdParty not recordedyes
Ken IvoryParty not recordedabsent
Tiara AuxierParty not recordedno
Val PetersonParty not recordedyes
Kristen ChevrierParty not recordedno
Rosalba DominguezParty not recordedyes
Steve EliasonParty not recordedyes
Jon HawkinsParty not recordedyes
Scott ChewParty not recordedyes
Nelson AbbottParty not recordedyes
Logan MonsonParty not recordedyes
Jason ThompsonParty not recordedyes
Candice PierucciParty not recordedabsent
Ray WardParty not recordedyes
Colin JackParty not recordedyes
Jason KyleParty not recordedno
Jill KofordParty not recordedyes
Cory MaloyParty not recordedyes
Matt MacPhersonParty not recordedyes
Tom PetersonParty not recordedyes
Tracy MillerParty not recordedyes
Jen Dailey-ProvostParty not recordedyes
Casey SniderParty not recordedyes
Leah HansenParty not recordedno
Mark StrongParty not recordedyes
Doug WeltonParty not recordedyes
Doug FiefiaParty not recordedyes
Melissa BallardParty not recordedyes
Ariel DefayParty not recordedyes
John ArthurParty not recordedyes
Karianne LisonbeeParty not recordedno
Norm ThurstonParty not recordedyes
Ashlee MatthewsParty not recordedyes
Stephen WhyteParty not recordedyes
Trevor LeeParty not recordedno
Mike KohlerParty not recordedno
Joseph ElisonParty not recordedyes
Dave ShallenbergerParty not recordedyes

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Division of Drinking Water, Carl R. Albrecht, Keven J. Stratton
OrganizationDivision of Drinking Water“Division overseeing public drinking water supplies”Map →
PersonCarl R. Albrecht“Chief Sponsor in the House”Map →
PersonKeven J. Stratton“Senate Sponsor”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record