POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Alabama HB 105 expands child enticing and electronic solicitation laws to include grooming and genital mutilation

Original title: Crimes and offenses; enticing a child for immoral purposes and electronic solicitation of a child, amended

Last action · March 19, 2026: Read for the Second Time and placed on the CalendarSponsor: Mark Gidley

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Alabama HB 105 expands state criminal statutes regarding child enticement and electronic solicitation to explicitly prohibit "ing" behaviors and proposals involving genital mutilation, effective October 1, 2026. The legislation broadens the definitions of these offenses and establishes that electronic solicitation crimes may be prosecuted in any county where any part of the offense occurred, where either the victim or defendant resided, or where any image was received.

Why it matters

The measure alters the scope of criminal liability for individuals accused of soliciting minors, widening prosecutorial jurisdiction across multiple counties and adding specific prohibited acts like ing and genital mutilation to existing felony statutes.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Minors under 16 years of age

The legal definitions and protections regarding child enticement and electronic solicitation are expanded to cover grooming and additional prohibited acts.

Directly affected

Defendants charged with child enticement or electronic solicitation

Individuals facing prosecution are subject to expanded statutory definitions of grooming and broader multi-county jurisdictional rules for electronic offenses.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What new behaviors are added to the child enticement and electronic solicitation laws?
The bill explicitly adds "ing"—defined as engaging in a pattern of behavior that seeks to prepare, induce, or persuade a child through emotional connection, trust-building, or manipulation—as well as references to genital mutilation.
Which counties can prosecute an electronic solicitation crime under this bill?
An electronic solicitation offense may be prosecuted in any county where any part of the crime took place, where either the victim or the defendant resided, or where any images were received.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

10 actions
  1. Mar 19, 2026Senate
    Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar
  2. Mar 18, 2026SenateCommittee
    Reported Out of Committee Second House
  3. Jan 27, 2026SenateCommittee
    Pending Committee Action in Second House
  4. Jan 27, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read for the first time and referred to the Senate Committee on Judiciary
  5. Jan 27, 2026HouseFloor
    Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass - Adopted Roll Call 195
  6. Jan 27, 2026House
    Third Reading in House of Origin
Show 4 earlier actions
  1. Jan 21, 2026House
    Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar
  2. Jan 21, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported Out of Committee House of Origin
  3. Jan 13, 2026HouseCommittee
    Pending Committee Action in House of Origin
  4. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read for the first time and referred to the House Committee on Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Electronic Solicitation Jurisdiction

The bill broadens jurisdictional reach by allowing prosecution in any county where any part of the crime occurred, where either party resided, or where images were received.

Connected Entities

Mark Gidley
PersonMark Gidley“Representative who introduced HB 105”Map →

Sources

Open source document

alison.legislature.state.al.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record