POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing on Federal Regulations and the Workforce

Original title: HOW THE ADMINISTRATION'S REGULATORY ONSLAUGHT IS AFFECTING WORKERS AND JOB CREATORS

Record date · January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House Subcommittee on Workforce Protections held a hearing on December 9, 2015, to examine how federal regulations impact workers and businesses. Lawmakers and invited experts discussed the balance between regulatory compliance and economic growth.

Why it matters

This hearing served as a formal record of testimony regarding the economic and operational effects of federal labor regulations on private-sector employers and employees.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Private-sector employers

These entities are subject to federal labor regulations discussed during the hearing.

Directly affected

Workers

Workers are subject to workplace protections and labor standards influenced by federal regulatory policy.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on December 9, 2015, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The Subcommittee on Workforce Protections convened to discuss the impact of federal regulations on workers and job creators.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the American Action Forum, Highland Engineering, Inc., Jackson Lewis P.C., and the National Employment Law Project.
  • The committee entered several Mercatus Center reports into the record regarding regulatory accumulation and behavioral analysis of compliance.
Show all 5 facts
  • The hearing was held under the 114th Congress, First Session.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
To gather testimony and evidence regarding how federal regulations affect the workforce and business operations.
Who testified at the hearing?
Experts from the American Action Forum, Highland Engineering, Inc., Jackson Lewis P.C., and the National Employment Law Project provided testimony.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Regulatory Accumulation

The committee placed significant emphasis on the cumulative effect of regulations rather than just individual rules, as evidenced by the inclusion of multiple Mercatus Center reports.

Connected Entities

Ralph Beebe, Tim Walberg, Sam Batkins and 3 more
PersonRalph Beebe“President, Highland Engineering, Inc.”Map →
PersonTim Walberg“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections”Map →
PersonSam Batkins“Director of Regulatory Policy, American Action Forum”Map →
OrganizationMercatus Center“Provided research reports on regulatory accumulation and compliance”Map →
PersonFrederica S. Wilson“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections”Map →
PersonChristine Owens“Executive Director, National Employment Law Project”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record