POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas HB 1845 restricts rural prosecutor grant funds to staff salary increases and new hires

Original title: Relating to the use of funds from the rural prosecutor's office salary assistance grant program.

Last action · May 19, 2025: Referred to FinanceSponsors: Angelia Orr and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Texas House Bill 1845 specifies that grant money awarded through the may be used only to increase the salaries of existing staff or to hire additional personnel, effective September 1, 2025.

Why it matters

Changes how local prosecutor offices can allocate state grant dollars, limiting expenditures exclusively to personnel compensation and expansion.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

prosecutor's office

Offices awarded grants must restrict their spending exclusively to staff salary increases and hiring additional personnel.

Directly affected

assistant attorney

Employees in these roles are eligible to receive salary increases funded by the grant program.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What can rural prosecutor offices use the grant money for under HB 1845?
Offices may use the grant money exclusively to increase salaries for specific staff positions like assistant attorneys, investigators, paralegals, and victim assistance coordinators, or to hire additional staff.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

27 actions
  1. May 19, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to Finance
  2. May 19, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Read first time
  3. May 19, 2025Senate
    Received from the House
  4. May 16, 2025House
    Reported engrossed
  5. May 16, 2025House
    Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  6. May 16, 2025HouseFloor
    Record vote (RV#2826)
Show 21 earlier actions
  1. May 16, 2025HouseFloor
    Passed
  2. May 16, 2025HouseFloor
    Read 3rd time
  3. May 15, 2025House
    Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  4. May 15, 2025HouseFloor
    Record vote (RV#2703)
  5. May 15, 2025HouseFloor
    Passed to engrossment
  6. May 15, 2025HouseFloor
    Read 2nd time
  7. May 12, 2025House
    Placed on General State Calendar
  8. May 10, 2025House
    Considered in Calendars
  9. May 9, 2025House
    Committee report sent to Calendars
  10. May 8, 2025House
    Committee report distributed
  11. May 8, 2025House
    Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  12. Apr 28, 2025HouseCommittee
    Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  13. Apr 28, 2025House
    Considered in formal meeting
  14. Apr 28, 2025House
    Recalled from subcommittee
  15. Mar 31, 2025House
    Left pending in subcommittee
  16. Mar 31, 2025House
    Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in subcommittee
  17. Mar 31, 2025House
    Considered by s/c in public hearing
  18. Mar 31, 2025House
    Scheduled for public hearing in s/c on . . .
  19. Mar 14, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to s/c on County & Regional Government by Speaker
  20. Mar 14, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  21. Jan 14, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Local Government Code
OrganizationLocal Government Code“Statute being amended by the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record