Florida Department of Transportation Non-Motorized Traffic Monitoring Program Agreement

Record date · May 13, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

This document is a for the Board of County Commissioners regarding a traffic monitoring program for non-motorized travel, such as walking and cycling. It establishes an agreement between the county and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to track traffic patterns for non-vehicle road users.

Why it matters

This agreement formalizes how the county will collect data on pedestrian and cyclist traffic, which may influence future infrastructure planning and road safety projects.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Pedestrians and Cyclists

Their movement patterns on public roads will be tracked and recorded as part of the data collection program.

Directly affected

Board of County Commissioners

The board is responsible for entering into the agreement and overseeing the implementation of the monitoring program.

Key Facts

The document is filed under number 2025-7092.
The item is classified as a 'Consent Item - Regular', meaning it is typically approved without extensive debate.
The agreement involves the Florida Department of Transportation and the Board of County Commissioners.
The program focuses on monitoring non-motorized traffic, specifically targeting pedestrians and cyclists.

Show all 5 facts

The document was introduced on April 15, 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a 'non-motorized' traffic monitoring program?

It is a program designed to count and track the movement of people who are not in motor vehicles, such as people walking, running, or riding bicycles.

What does it mean that this is a 'Consent Item'?

In local government, a is usually a routine matter that is approved by the board in a single vote without individual discussion.

What else do you want to know?