POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Hearing on the 'Independent State Legislature' Theory

Original title: THE INDEPENDENT STATE LEGISLATURE THEORY AND ITS POTENTIAL TO DISRUPT OUR DEMOCRACY

January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing explores a legal theory that could fundamentally change how federal elections are regulated by determining whether state legislatures have exclusive authority over election rules, potentially bypassing state courts and constitutions.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

State Legislatures

The theory directly concerns the scope of their constitutional authority to set election rules.

State Courts

The theory addresses whether state courts have the power to review or strike down election laws passed by state legislatures.

Voters

Changes to election administration rules could impact how federal elections are conducted and how legal challenges to those elections are resolved.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2022.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Committee on Administration held a hearing on July 28, 2022, to examine the 'Independent State Legislature' theory and its potential impact on U.S. elections. The hearing featured testimony from legal experts and included extensive submissions regarding the constitutional authority of state legislatures over federal election processes.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on July 28, 2022, by the Committee on House Administration.
  • The primary subject was the 'Independent State Legislature' theory, which concerns the scope of state legislative power over federal elections under the U.S. Constitution.
  • Three expert witnesses provided testimony: Richard Pildes, Carolyn Shapiro, and Eliza Sweren-Becker.
  • The record includes numerous submissions, including legal analyses of the Elections Clause and various court cases such as Bush v. Gore and Rucho v. Common Cause.
  • Ranking Member Rodney Davis submitted materials related to the American Confidence in Elections (ACE) Act.
  • The hearing record spans two books of documentation, including questions for the record and extensive academic and legal submissions.

Why It Matters

The hearing explores a legal theory that could fundamentally change how federal elections are regulated by determining whether state legislatures have exclusive authority over election rules, potentially bypassing state courts and constitutions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 'Independent State Legislature' theory?
It is a legal theory suggesting that the U.S. Constitution grants state legislatures primary and potentially exclusive authority to regulate federal elections, independent of state courts or state constitutions.
What was the purpose of this hearing?
The committee convened to gather expert testimony and documentation to understand the legal implications of this theory on the administration of federal elections.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Constitutional Authority

The hearing highlights a shift toward litigating the fundamental constitutional source of election administration power rather than just specific voting procedures.

Connected Entities

personRodney DavisRanking Member of the Committee on House AdministrationMap →
personZoe LofgrenChairperson of the Committee on House AdministrationMap →
personEliza Sweren-BeckerWitness, Counsel at the Brennan Center for JusticeMap →
personCarolyn ShapiroWitness, Professor of Law at Chicago-Kent College of LawMap →
personRichard PildesWitness, Professor of Constitutional Law at NYUMap →
organizationCommittee on House AdministrationHouse committee conducting the hearingMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record