POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Six Assurances to Taiwan Act

Last action · May 15, 2025: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Sponsors: Raja Krishnamoorthi and 28 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill seeks to formally the 'Six Assurances'—a set of long-standing foreign policy principles regarding U.S.-Taiwan relations—into federal law. It establishes a requirement for the President to submit proposed actions related to these assurances to Congress for review.

Why it matters

This bill would legally bind the executive branch to specific foreign policy commitments regarding Taiwan, potentially limiting presidential discretion in diplomatic negotiations and arms sales involving China.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Taiwan

The bill establishes legal protections and policy commitments regarding U.S. arms sales and diplomatic relations with Taiwan.

Directly affected

People's Republic of China

The bill codifies U.S. policy positions that explicitly reject certain diplomatic or military concessions regarding Taiwan that the PRC has historically sought.

Directly affected

Executive Branch (President)

The President would be required to submit proposed actions related to the Six Assurances to Congress for review.

Key Facts

  • The bill codifies the 'Six Assurances' as official U.S. policy, which include: no set date for ending arms sales to Taiwan, no prior consultation with the PRC on arms sales, no U.S. mediation role, no revision of the Taiwan Relations Act, no change in U.S. position on Taiwan's sovereignty, and no pressure on Taiwan to negotiate with the PRC.
  • The President is required to submit any proposed actions related to these Six Assurances to Congress for review before implementation.
  • The bill declares that any unilateral change to the status quo of the Taiwan Strait or a negotiated settlement without the consent of both sides is unacceptable.
  • The bill asserts that the future of Taiwan must be determined by peaceful means.
Show all 6 facts
  • The bill references the 1982 Joint Communique as the historical context for the Six Assurances.
  • The bill cites multiple previous laws, including the Taiwan Relations Act and the Asia Reassurance Initiative Act of 2018, as existing frameworks for U.S.-Taiwan relations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the 'Six Assurances'?
They are six foreign policy principles articulated in 1982 regarding U.S. relations with Taiwan, primarily concerning arms sales, , and the U.S. role in negotiations between Taiwan and the People's Republic of China.
Does this bill change current U.S. policy?
The bill aims to existing policy into law and create a formal congressional review process for executive actions related to these assurances.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. May 15, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  2. May 15, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Legislative Encroachment on Executive Foreign Policy

The bill represents a move to restrict presidential flexibility in foreign affairs by mandating congressional review of actions related to the Six Assurances.

Connected Entities

George Shultz, John H. Holdridge, Lawrence Eagleburger and 2 more
PersonGeorge Shultz“Former Secretary of State who provided the Six Assurances to Taiwan in 1982.”Map →
PersonJohn H. Holdridge“Former Assistant Secretary of State who testified on the Six Assurances.”Map →
PersonLawrence Eagleburger“Former Under Secretary of State who articulated the Six Assurances in 1982.”Map →
PersonRaja Krishnamoorthi“Primary sponsor of the bill in the House of Representatives.”Map →
PersonGregory Meeks“Co-sponsor of the bill.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record