Hearing on Protecting European Jewish Communities from Terrorist Attacks
January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing informs federal policy regarding international security cooperation and the protection of religious minority communities abroad.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
European Jewish communities
These communities are the primary subjects of the security discussions and potential targets of the violence addressed in the hearing.
Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe
The Commission is responsible for oversight and policy recommendations regarding security cooperation in the OSCE region.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on April 19, 2016, in the Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC.
- The Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe convened the hearing to address the prevention of deadly attacks on European Jewish communities.
- Witnesses included representatives from the American Jewish Committee, the Belgian Jewish Community Crisis Cell, Rutgers University, and the Secure Community Network.
- The hearing included testimony provided via videoconference from Brussels, Belgium.
- The session was part of the 114th Congress, Second Session.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who participated in the hearing?
Why It Matters
The hearing informs federal policy regarding international security cooperation and the protection of religious minority communities abroad.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
International Coordination
The hearing highlights the use of international videoconferencing to integrate local European security perspectives into U.S. Congressional oversight.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools