POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas sets prior authorization deadlines and bans prior approval for emergency care and deliveries

Original title: AN ACT concerning insurance; enacting the transparency in prior authorization act; imposing certain requirements and limitations on the use of prior authorization in the delivery of healthcare services.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died in Committee

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 330 establishes strict timelines for health insurers and utilization review entities to process requests, bans prior authorization for emergency services and childbirth, and prohibits retroactive denials except in cases of fraud.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

enrollees

Enrollees are protected from prior authorization requirements for emergency services, deliveries, and chronic care treatments, and benefit from mandated response timelines for their healthcare requests.

Directly affected

healthcare providers

Healthcare providers gain free electronic portals, standardized pharmacy transactions, guaranteed appeal and peer-to-peer review timeframes, and protection from retroactive denials.

Directly affected

utilization review entities

Utilization review entities must comply with strict decision timelines, adopt secure electronic transmission standards, cease requiring prior authorization for specified services, and submit annual statistical reports to the insurance commissioner.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an insurance company require prior authorization for an emergency room visit or childbirth?
No. Under Senate Bill 330, utilization review entities are expressly prohibited from requiring for pre-hospital transportation, emergency healthcare services, or birth by cesarean section, vaginal delivery, or neonatal intensive care services.
What are the decision deadlines for non-urgent versus urgent prior authorization requests?
For regular healthcare services, the must render a decision within 14 calendar days of receiving all requested information. For urgent healthcare services, the deadline is 24 hours, and for emergency services, the deadline is two hours.
How long does a prior authorization remain valid for chronic conditions?
If is required for a healthcare service treating a chronic or long-term care condition, the authorization remains valid for the entire length of the treatment without requiring additional authorizations.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026Senate
    Died in Committee
  2. Feb 4, 2026Senate
    Hearing: Wednesday, February 4, 2026, 9:30 AM — Room 546-S
  3. Jan 15, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance
  4. Jan 14, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Comprehensive Prior Authorization Reform

The bill shifts responsibilities by placing strict statutory time limits on insurers for urgent, emergency, and routine care reviews while entirely removing prior authorization hurdles for emergency services and childbirth.

Connected Entities

Board of Examiners in Optometry, Behavioral Sciences Regulatory Board, State Board of Healing Arts and 7 more
OrganizationBoard of Examiners in Optometry“board licensing optometrists”Map →
OrganizationBehavioral Sciences Regulatory Board“board authorizing behavioral sciences professionals”Map →
OrganizationState Board of Healing Arts“state board licensing physicians and healing arts practitioners”Map →
OrganizationBoard of Nursing“board licensing nurses and advanced practice registered nurses”Map →
OrganizationKansas Department of Insurance“department publishing utilization review reports on its website”Map →
OrganizationKansas Dental Board“board licensing dentists under the dental practices act”Map →
OrganizationState Board of Pharmacy“board licensing pharmacists”Map →
OrganizationSenate Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance“legislative committee that sponsored SB 330”Map →
otherKansas Register“publication where the act takes effect”Map →
PersonCommissioner of Insurance“commissioner receiving utilization review reports”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record