POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Senate Hearing on 'Waters of the U.S.' Regulations

Original title: A REVIEW OF WATERS OF THE U.S. REGULATIONS: THEIR IMPACT ON STATES AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

Record date · January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript of a 2019 Senate joint committee hearing regarding federal regulations defining 'Waters of the United States' () under the Clean Water Act. The hearing examined how these definitions impact state authority, agricultural operations, and land use.

Why it matters

The hearing explores the scope of federal authority to regulate water bodies, which determines whether landowners, farmers, and local governments need federal permits for activities on their property.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Farmers and Ranchers

Federal water definitions determine whether agricultural activities on their land require federal permits.

Directly affected

State and Local Governments

The scope of federal jurisdiction impacts the extent of local land-use authority and state-level water management.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 12, 2019, by the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works and the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Water, and Wildlife.
  • The primary subject was the definition of 'Waters of the United States' (WOTUS) and its impact on states and citizens.
  • Witnesses included representatives from state agriculture departments, farm bureaus, and county government.
  • The record includes a 2016 Senate report on the expansion of jurisdiction claimed by the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers.
Show all 7 facts
  • The record includes multiple letters from industry groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Home Builders, regarding the regulations.
  • The record includes letters from environmental organizations like the Natural Resources Defense Council and the National Parks Conservation Association.
  • The record includes a May 2019 court order from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, regarding EPA litigation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 'Waters of the United States' (WOTUS) rule?
It is a regulatory definition used by the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers to determine which bodies of water fall under federal and protection under the Clean Water Act.
Why were these witnesses invited to testify?
They were invited to provide perspectives from state agriculture departments, farming organizations, and local county governments on how federal water definitions affect their daily operations and land management.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Regulatory Tension

The hearing highlights a clear divide between industry groups seeking narrower federal jurisdiction and environmental groups advocating for broader federal protection of water bodies.

Connected Entities

Kevin Cramer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, John Barrasso and 4 more
PersonKevin Cramer“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Water, and Wildlife”Map →
OrganizationU.S. Environmental Protection Agency“Federal agency responsible for Clean Water Act enforcement”Map →
PersonJohn Barrasso“Chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works”Map →
PersonRichard Elias“Supervisor, Pima County Board of Supervisors, Arizona”Map →
PersonTodd Fornstrom“President, Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation”Map →
OrganizationArmy Corps of Engineers“Federal agency involved in water jurisdiction”Map →
PersonDoug C. Goehring“Commissioner, North Dakota Department of Agriculture”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record