POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing on Radicalization in U.S. Prisons

Original title: TERROR INMATES: COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMISM IN PRISON AND BEYOND

Record date · January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript of a 2015 House Subcommittee hearing focused on the risks of violent extremism and within the American prison system. Experts and lawmakers discussed the influence of terrorist propaganda on inmates and the challenges of monitoring these activities.

Why it matters

The hearing examines federal and state strategies for identifying and managing radicalized individuals in correctional facilities, which impacts national security policy and prison management protocols.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Correctional Facilities

These institutions are responsible for implementing security measures to monitor and mitigate radicalization among inmates.

Directly affected

Law Enforcement Agencies

Agencies like the FBI are tasked with investigating home-grown violent extremists and monitoring potential radicalization threats.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on October 28, 2015, in the Cannon House Office Building.
  • The Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence held the hearing to address radicalization in U.S. prisons.
  • Chairman Peter T. King stated that 55 people were arrested in the U.S. for links to ISIS in 2015.
  • Approximately 200 individuals had traveled to the Middle East to join ISIS as of October 2015.
Show all 6 facts
  • FBI Director James Comey reported an estimated 900 active investigations into home-grown violent extremists across all 50 states.
  • The hearing included testimony from experts in organized crime, state corrections, and the study of hate and extremism.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary purpose of this hearing?
The subcommittee met to hear expert testimony regarding the threat of and violent extremism within U.S. prison populations.
Who provided expert testimony at the hearing?
Testimony was provided by Jerome P. Bjelopera (Congressional Research Service), Tony C. Parker (Tennessee Department of Correction), and Brian H. Levin (California State University, San Bernardino).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Prison Radicalization

The hearing highlights a specific policy focus on the intersection of domestic prison management and international counterterrorism efforts.

Connected Entities

House Committee on Homeland Security, Brian H. Levin, James B. Comey and 3 more
OrganizationHouse Committee on Homeland Security“The committee hosting the hearing”Map →
PersonBrian H. Levin“Professor and Director, Center for Study of Hate and Extremism”Map →
PersonJames B. Comey“FBI Director at the time of the hearing”Map →
PersonPeter T. King“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence”Map →
PersonJerome P. Bjelopera“Specialist in Organized Crime and Terrorism, Congressional Research Service”Map →
PersonTony C. Parker“Assistant Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Correction”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record