POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas House Bill 1795 increases criminal penalties for dog fighting and cockfighting offenses

Original title: Relating to increasing the criminal penalty for certain conduct constituting the offense of dog fighting or the offense of cockfighting.

Last action · May 1, 2025: Committee report sent to CalendarsSponsors: Rafael Anchía and 1 other

Companion · SB 2426same policy, Senate version
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Texas HB 1795 raises specific offenses related to dog fighting and cockfighting to a , effective September 1, 2025. The legislation alters criminal classifications under the Penal Code for prohibited conduct involving animal fighting.

Why it matters

Changes criminal sentencing categories and potential incarceration times for individuals convicted of participating in or facilitating dog fighting and cockfighting.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Individuals prosecuted for dog fighting or cockfighting

Offenders face modified criminal classifications and potential state jail felony penalties for specific conduct related to dog fighting and cockfighting.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What criminal penalty does HB 1795 establish for dog fighting and cockfighting offenses?
Except as otherwise provided by the subsections, offenses under Sections 42.10 and 42.105 of the Penal Code are generally classified as state jail felonies under the bill.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

16 actions
  1. May 1, 2025House
    Committee report sent to Calendars
  2. Apr 30, 2025House
    Committee report distributed
  3. Apr 30, 2025House
    Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  4. Apr 24, 2025HouseCommittee
    Reported favorably as substituted
  5. Apr 24, 2025House
    Committee substitute considered in committee
  6. Apr 24, 2025House
    Considered in formal meeting
Show 10 earlier actions
  1. Apr 24, 2025House
    Recalled from subcommittee
  2. Apr 15, 2025House
    Left pending in subcommittee
  3. Apr 15, 2025House
    Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in subcommittee
  4. Apr 15, 2025House
    Committee substitute considered in s/c
  5. Apr 15, 2025House
    Considered by s/c in public hearing
  6. Apr 15, 2025House
    Scheduled for public hearing in s/c on . . .
  7. Mar 25, 2025House
    Referred directly to subcommittee by chair
  8. Mar 14, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
  9. Mar 14, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  10. Jan 9, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Wu, Joanne Shofner, 42.105 and 4 more
PersonWu“Substitute bill author”Map →
PersonJoanne Shofner“Bill sponsor”Map →
other42.105“Section of the Penal Code”Map →
OrganizationPenal Code“Statutory code being amended”Map →
other42.10“Section of the Penal Code”Map →
other89“Legislative session number”Map →
PersonRafael Anchía“Bill author in the House”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record