POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Florida Senate Prohibits Prior Authorization Medical Necessity Reviews and Requires Choice of Equipment Providers in Medicaid Managed Care

Original title: Managed Care Plans

Last action · March 13, 2026: Died in Health PolicySponsors: Gayle Harrell and 1 other

Companion · HB 531same policy, House version
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Florida Senate Bill 568 prohibits Medicaid managed care plans from reviewing previously authorized claims for medical necessity during s, and requires plans to provide coverage for durable medical equipment and from any qualified provider within the network chosen by the enrollee, starting July 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Medicaid enrollees gain the legal right to select their preferred in-network provider for durable medical equipment and , and managed care plans are barred from re-evaluating medical necessity on claims they have already approved.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Medicaid enrollees

Enrollees gain the right to select their preferred qualified in-network provider for durable medical equipment and complex rehabilitation technology and are protected from medical necessity re-reviews on pre-authorized claims.

Directly affected

Medicaid managed care plans

Managed care plans are prohibited from conducting medical necessity reviews on previously authorized claims and must permit enrollees to choose any qualified in-network provider for medical equipment.

Directly affected

Agency for Health Care Administration

The Agency is required to adopt implementation rules and establish a grievance procedure for enrollees regarding provider choice.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a managed care plan re-check a claim for medical necessity after it has already given prior authorization?
No. SB 568 prohibits managed care plans from conducting prepayment or postpayment medical necessity reviews for previously approved equipment, supplies, or services.
Do Medicaid enrollees have a choice in who provides their durable medical equipment?
Yes. Managed care plans must provide coverage for durable medical equipment and from any qualified provider within the provider network that the enrollee chooses.
What can an enrollee do if they are denied the ability to choose their provider from within the network?
The bill requires the Agency for Health Care Administration to provide a procedure within the grievance resolution process for enrollees to file a complaint.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Mar 13, 2026SenateFloor
    Died in Health Policy
  2. Jan 13, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced
  3. Dec 9, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to Health Policy; Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services; Appropriations
  4. Nov 18, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Filed

Version history & redline

2 versions on file

Official version history is partial: 1 linked text is unavailable or incomplete. Source links remain available below.

Comparing Filed → Filed
removed addedOfficial text

The text diff for this stage has not been computed yet.

Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

Finance Connection

Notable money activity
$90,385across 20 reported contributions
Trace money trail →
CandidateDonorAmountIndustryDate
Ana Maria RodriguezFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$50,000STATE PARTYDec 2025
Ana Maria RodriguezFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$3,730STATE PARTYSep 2025
Ana Maria RodriguezFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$3,583STATE PARTYMay 2026
Ana Maria RodriguezFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$3,532STATE PARTYApr 2026
Ana Maria RodriguezFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$3,516STATE PARTYDec 2025
Ana Maria RodriguezFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$3,516STATE PARTYJan 2026
Ana Maria RodriguezFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$3,513STATE PARTYMar 2026
Ana Maria RodriguezFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$3,490STATE PARTYMar 2026
Show 12 more contributions
Ana Maria RodriguezFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$3,369STATE PARTYDec 2025
Ana Maria RodriguezFLORIDA REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$2,137STATE PARTYOct 2025
Ana Maria RodriguezARIEL FIGUEREDO MD PA$1,000GYNECOLOGISTNov 2025
Ana Maria RodriguezAT&T SOUTH FLORIDA PAC$1,000PACDec 2025
Ana Maria RodriguezCAPITOL SOLUTIONS, LLC$1,000GOVT. AND PUBLIC AFFAIRSFeb 2025
Ana Maria RodriguezCEMEX MATERIALS LLC$1,000CONCRETE AND BUILDING SUPPLIERJan 2026
Ana Maria RodriguezCAP ENGINEERING INC$1,000ENGINEERING FIRMSep 2025
Ana Maria RodriguezABC MERIT SHOP PC$1,000PACFeb 2025
Ana Maria RodriguezFAPSC PAC$1,000PACAug 2025
Ana Maria RodriguezBY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE$1,000PACJan 2026
Ana Maria RodriguezDADE COUNTY PBA PAC$1,000PACJan 2026
Ana Maria RodriguezBERUFF CARLOS$1,000R.E. DEVELOPERMay 2026

Reported financial relationships and timing signals. This does not prove motive or influence. Readers draw their own conclusions.

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Restriction on Retroactive Medical Necessity Reviews

The bill explicitly closes the loophole of re-evaluating medical necessity on claims that already received prior authorization.

Connected Entities

Agency for Health Care Administration, Medicaid

Sources

Open source document

www.flsenate.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record