House Armed Services Committee Hearing on 2016 Defense Budget
January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing served as the formal legislative process for determining how the U.S. Department of Defense would allocate funding for personnel, equipment, and operations in fiscal year 2016.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Military Departments
The budget request determines the funding levels for operations, personnel, and equipment for the Army, Navy, and Air Force.
Members of Congress
Committee members are responsible for reviewing and authorizing the budget request through the legislative process.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on March 17, 2015, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The purpose of the hearing was to examine the President's fiscal year 2016 budget request for the U.S. military.
- The committee heard testimony from the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, as well as senior military leadership.
- The hearing included the submission of prepared statements from service secretaries and chiefs regarding their respective budget requirements.
- Post-hearing questions were submitted by several members of Congress, including Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Graves, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Shuster, Ms. Tsongas, and Mr. Walz.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the primary goal of this hearing?
Who testified at this hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing served as the formal legislative process for determining how the U.S. Department of Defense would allocate funding for personnel, equipment, and operations in fiscal year 2016.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Budgetary Oversight Cycle
The document highlights the standard annual cycle of military budget authorization occurring in the first quarter of the calendar year.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance80How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools