Part ofGuantanamo Bay →

FEDERALhearing transcript

High Impact

Congressional Hearing on Guantanamo Bay Detainee Releases

Original title: DEMANDING ACCOUNTABILITY: THE ADMINISTRATION'S RECKLESS RELEASE OF TERRORISTS FROM GUANTANAMO

January 1, 2016

Guantanamo Bay National Security Foreign Policy Congressional Oversight Detainee Transfers

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing addresses the federal government's oversight and security protocols for releasing detainees, which impacts national security policy and the diplomatic agreements used to manage former prisoners.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Department of State

Responsible for negotiating detainee transfer agreements and monitoring released individuals.

U.S. Department of Defense

Responsible for the detention facility and providing assessments on detainee risk levels.

House Committee on Foreign Affairs

Conducts oversight of the administration's foreign policy and detention transfer processes.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Committee on Foreign Affairs held a hearing on July 7, 2016, to question Obama administration officials regarding the process and risks associated with transferring detainees from the Guantanamo Bay facility to foreign countries. Committee members challenged the accuracy of previous testimony provided by Department of State and Department of Defense officials concerning the vetting and monitoring of released individuals.

Key Facts

The hearing took place on July 7, 2016, before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
The committee investigated the administration's process for transferring detainees to foreign countries.
Chairman Royce alleged that previous testimony from officials regarding the ability of receiving countries to mitigate recidivism was inconsistent with intelligence reports.
The Washington Post reported that at least 12 released detainees have attacked U.S. or allied forces, resulting in approximately six American deaths.
The Secretary of State holds the primary responsibility for negotiating transfer agreements and monitoring conditions.
The committee requested information on the 'return to terrorism' rate for released individuals.
The hearing included testimony from Lee Wolosky (State Department) and Paul M. Lewis (Department of Defense).

Why It Matters

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary purpose of this hearing?

To hold the administration accountable for the process of releasing detainees from Guantanamo Bay and to address concerns about the accuracy of information provided to Congress regarding those transfers.

What concerns did the Committee raise about released detainees?

The Committee raised concerns that some released detainees have returned to the battlefield and attacked U.S. or allied forces, and that the administration may have transferred detainees to countries lacking the resources to monitor them effectively.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Oversight Tension

The document highlights a significant breakdown in communication between the executive branch and the legislative committee regarding the vetting of foreign countries for detainee transfers.

House Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. Department of State U.S. Department of Defense

Connected Entities

personPaul M. Lewis“Special Envoy for Guantanamo Detention Closure, U.S. Department of Defense”Map →

personLee Wolosky“Special Envoy for Guantanamo Closure, U.S. Department of State”Map →

organizationHouse Committee on Foreign Affairs“Congressional committee conducting the hearing”Map →

locationGuantanamo Bay“Detention facility site”Map →

personEdward R. Royce“Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance80
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy85
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment40
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz30
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools