POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Proposed 'Deterring Adversary Ill-Gotten Gains Act'

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6291

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This proposed amendment to the annual defense authorization bill would create new procedures for the U.S. government to seize and forfeit assets belonging to Russian 's.' It expands the types of property eligible for forfeiture and extends the authority to use these funds to remediate harms caused by Russian aggression in Ukraine.

Why it matters

If enacted, this amendment would grant the Attorney General broader authority to bypass standard judicial processes when seizing assets linked to Russian-related sanctions violations, with the proceeds directed toward Ukraine-related remediation efforts for a period of three years.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Russian-linked entities and individuals

Their assets may be subject to nonjudicial civil forfeiture if they are found to be in violation of U.S. sanctions or export controls.

Directly affected

Attorney General

Granted new authority to certify property for forfeiture and issue regulations without standard administrative procedures.

Directly affected

Secretary of the Treasury

Granted new authority to issue regulations without standard administrative procedures.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this amendment do?
It creates a streamlined process for the U.S. government to seize assets from individuals or entities violating sanctions related to Russia and the conflict in Ukraine, and directs those assets toward remediation efforts.
How long would this authority last?
The provisions of this amendment would terminate three years after the date of the Act's enactment.
Does this change how the government makes rules for these seizures?
Yes, it allows the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury to create regulations for this program without following the standard public notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Streamlining Asset Seizure

The amendment explicitly bypasses standard administrative rulemaking requirements (5 U.S.C. 553) to accelerate the implementation of asset forfeiture procedures against sanctioned entities.

Connected Entities

Bureau of Industry and Security, Attorney General, Secretary of the Treasury and 2 more
OrganizationBureau of Industry and Security“Maintains the restricted parties lists referenced in the amendment.”Map →
PersonAttorney General“Authorized to certify property for forfeiture and prescribe regulations.”Map →
PersonSecretary of the Treasury“Authorized to prescribe regulations for the subtitle.”Map →
PersonMr. Whitehouse“U.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →
PersonMr. Graham“U.S. Senator who co-sponsored the amendment.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record