POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR3534FEDERALin_committee
High Impact

The Justice is BLIND Act of 2023

Original title: Justice is BLIND Act of 2023

May 21, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.May 18, 2023
Lead sponsor

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

The bill would change how federal judges manage their personal investments, requiring them to relinquish control over individual stocks, commodities, and s while serving on the bench.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Federal judges and justices

They must transfer specific financial assets into blind trusts and provide public attestations of compliance.

Spouses and dependent children of federal judges

Their financial assets are subject to the same blind trust requirements as the judge, unless the assets are part of their primary occupation.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill requires federal judges, justices, and their immediate families to place certain financial assets into a to prevent potential conflicts of interest. It mandates written attestations of compliance and requires these records to be made publicly available online.

Key Facts

  • Requires federal justices, judges, magistrate judges, and bankruptcy judges to place 'covered financial interests' into a qualified blind trust.
  • Applies to the financial interests of the judge, their spouse, and their dependent children.
  • Judges currently in office must comply within 90 days of the bill's effective date.
  • New judges must comply within 90 days of assuming office.
  • Assets must remain in the blind trust until 180 days after the judge leaves office.
  • Judges must provide written attestation of compliance within 15 days of establishing the trust.
  • Attestations must be published on a searchable public database managed by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.
  • Exempts assets that are part of a spouse or dependent child's primary occupation compensation.
  • Exempts diversified investment funds and U.S. Treasury securities from the blind trust requirement.
  • Defines 'covered financial interest' as securities, commodities, futures, or derivative-based economic interests.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this apply to all investments held by a judge?
No. It applies to 's' like individual stocks, commodities, and futures. It does not apply to diversified investment funds or U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds.
Can a judge keep their assets in the trust after they retire?
The bill requires the trust to remain in place until 180 days after the judge ceases to hold their position.
Where can the public see if a judge is in compliance?
The Administrative Office of the United States Courts is required to publish written attestations of compliance on a searchable internet database.

Why It Matters

The bill would change how federal judges manage their personal investments, requiring them to relinquish control over individual stocks, commodities, and s while serving on the bench.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Expansion of Financial Disclosure

The bill moves beyond simple disclosure of assets to active management restrictions (blind trusts) for the federal judiciary.

Connected Entities

organizationAdministrative Office of the United States CourtsResponsible for publishing compliance attestationsMap →
personAdam SchiffU.S. Representative who introduced the billMap →
organizationCommittee on the JudiciaryHouse committee to which the bill was referredMap →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record