POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Missouri House Bill 2321 establishes criminal penalties and fines for unauthorized AI-generated deepfakes and altered media

Original title: CONTENT CREATED THROUGH THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Last action · February 26, 2026: HCS Reported Do Pass (H)Sponsor: Bill Lucas

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Missouri House Bill 2321 creates the "AI-Generated Content Accountability and Privacy Protection Act of 2026," criminalizing the unauthorized publication or distribution of algorithmically altered images, audio, or video. The measure sets tiered fines and prison sentences ranging from two to five years depending on whether the content is published on public platforms, is sexual in nature, or results in serious harm to a depicted individual. Exemptions are provided for clearly labeled artistic, educational, journalistic, and research content.

Why it matters

Residents and content creators face criminal liability and fines up to $110,000 for publishing unauthorized deepfake media, while the state attorney general is required to report on enforcement impacts to the general assembly by August 28, 2028.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

content creators

Content creators must include clear and conspicuous notices on artistic, satirical, or educational AI-altered media and risk criminal penalties if publishing non-consensual likenesses.

Directly affected

online public communication platform users

Users face higher statutory fines and prison sentences if unauthorized AI-generated content is published or distributed through public internet platforms.

Directly affected

depicted individuals

Individuals whose likenesses, voices, or images are digitally altered gain legal protections against non-consensual publication and distribution.

Key Facts

  • Establishes the "AI-Generated Content Accountability and Privacy Protection Act of 2026" under section 1.2052.
  • Defines algorithmically generated or altered content as any image, video, or audio recording wholly or substantially created, altered, or synthesized by automated means that materially changes a person's appearance, voice, or likeness.
  • Defines consent as explicit, informed, freely given, and revocable authorization documented in writing, electronically, or through a verifiable method.
  • Makes unauthorized publication of algorithmically altered content punishable by up to two years in prison or a fine of up to $20,000, or both.
Show all 13 facts
  • Increases the penalty for unauthorized altered content published through an online public communication platform to up to two years in prison or a fine of up to $50,000, or both.
  • Makes the unauthorized creation or distribution of sexual or pornographic algorithmically generated content punishable by up to two years in prison or a fine of up to $65,000, or both.
  • Increases the penalty for unauthorized sexual or pornographic altered content on an online public communication platform to up to three years in prison or a fine of up to $80,000, or both.
  • Sets maximum penalties of up to five years in prison or a fine of up to $110,000, or both, for unauthorized sexual or pornographic altered content that results in serious harm to the dignity, reputation, or safety of the depicted individual.
  • Exempts content that is clearly artistic, parodic, satirical, educational, or in the legitimate public interest, provided it includes a clear and conspicuous notice of artificial alteration.
  • Exempts synthetic content created or shared without intent to harm that causes no material injury to dignity, reputation, or privacy.
  • Exempts content used for bona fide research, journalism, or technological testing with appropriate safeguards and disclosure.
  • Requires any verification or age-confirmation systems used for compliance to adhere to data minimization and privacy-by-design principles, prohibiting the retention or sale of biometric or facial recognition data by third parties.
  • Requires the attorney general to submit a report to the general assembly on or before August 28, 2028, assessing penalty effectiveness, definition clarity, and impacts on free speech and research.

Frequently Asked Questions

What constitutes consent under this bill?
Consent is defined as explicit, informed, freely given, and revocable authorization by the person whose image, likeness, or voice is depicted, documented in writing, electronically, or through another verifiable method.
Are artistic or educational uses of AI exempt from these penalties?
Yes, content that is clearly artistic, parodic, satirical, educational, or for legitimate public interest is exempt, provided it includes a clear and conspicuous notice stating that it is artificially generated or altered.
What are the maximum penalties for distributing non-consensual sexual deepfakes online?
Distributing non-consensual sexual or pornographic altered content on an can result in up to three years in prison and a fine of up to $80,000. If it results in serious harm to the depicted individual's dignity, reputation, or safety, penalties increase to up to five years in prison or a fine of up to $110,000, or both.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

8 actions
  1. Feb 26, 2026HouseCommittee
    HCS Reported Do Pass (H)
  2. Feb 25, 2026HouseCommittee
    HCS Voted Do Pass (H)
  3. Feb 25, 2026House
    Executive Session Completed (H)
  4. Feb 16, 2026House
    Public Hearing Completed (H)
  5. Jan 22, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  6. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
Show 2 earlier actions
  1. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  2. Dec 10, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Establishment of AI Content Liability

The bill creates a comprehensive statutory framework criminalizing non-consensual deepfakes with tiered penalties based on platform distribution and harm.

Connected Entities

Joseph Engler, General Assembly
PersonJoseph Engler“Chief Clerk of the House”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Recipient of the attorney general report on AI-generated content”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record