The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Rhode Island Establishes Ranked Choice Voting for Presidential Primaries
Last action · March 26, 2026: Committee recommended measure be held for further studySponsors: Jennifer Stewart and 9 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Rhode Island establishes for presidential preference primaries and delegate elections, introducing new procedures for ballot tabulation and results reporting.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Rhode Island voters
Voters participate in presidential primaries using a ranked-choice ballot instead of selecting a single candidate.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does ranked choice voting work under this bill?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
3 actions- Mar 26, 2026Committee recommended measure be held for further study
- Mar 20, 2026Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (03/26/2026)
- Feb 12, 2026IntroducedIntroduced, referred to House State Government & Elections
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
status.rilegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz50Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
