POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Louisiana grants churches and religious leaders legal immunity when removing disruptive individuals with reasonable force

Original title: TRESPASS: Provides places of worship the right to remove disruptive individuals

Last action · May 15, 2026: Effective date: 08/01/2026.Sponsors: Gabe Firment and 35 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Act 148 allows religious leaders, authorized security team members, and individuals lawfully present at a place of worship to request that disruptive or trespassing individuals leave and use reasonable force to remove them. The measure provides civil immunity from for individuals and religious organizations using such force, and establishes an against civil or criminal actions, effective August 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Religious organizations and individuals lawfully present at places of worship gain explicit statutory authority and civil immunity to physically remove trespassers or disruptive persons without facing , provided the force used is not grossly disproportionate.

Background
  • House Bill 294 was introduced during the 2026 Regular Session of the Louisiana Legislature and was signed into law by the Governor as Act 148. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Religious leaders and organizations

Religious leaders and organizations gain statutory authority to request disruptive individuals to leave, along with civil immunity from tort liability when reasonable force is used.

Directly affected

Trespassers and disruptive individuals

Individuals who commit criminal trespass or substantial disruption at a place of worship are subject to being verbally ordered to leave and physically removed using reasonable force.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is authorized to ask a disruptive person to leave a place of worship?
Any religious leader, authorized security team member, or person who is lawfully on the premises of a church or other place of worship may request that a person leave.
Does this law protect individuals who use deadly force?
No, nothing in the section authorizes the use of deadly force except where otherwise allowed by law for purposes of self-defense.
Can peaceful protesters outside a church be removed under this law?
No. The law explicitly states it does not prohibit lawful, peaceful protests outside the premises that do not obstruct access.
What happens if someone files a civil lawsuit against a church for removing a trespasser?
The defendant may file a motion asserting immunity from suit, and the court must conduct a pretrial immunity hearing to dismiss the action if immunity is established.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

22 actions
  1. May 15, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Signed by the Governor. Becomes Act No. 148.
  2. May 15, 2026House
    Effective date: 08/01/2026.
  3. May 13, 2026House
    Sent to the Governor for executive approval.
  4. May 12, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Enrolled and signed by the Speaker of the House.
  5. May 12, 2026SenateEnrolled
    Signed by the President of the Senate.
  6. May 11, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, roll called, yeas 71, nays 29, Senate amendments concurred in.
Show 16 earlier actions
  1. May 7, 2026House
    Scheduled for concurrence on 05/11/2026.
  2. May 6, 2026House
    Received from the Senate with amendments.
  3. May 5, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate floor amendments read and adopted. Read by title, passed by a vote of 26 yeas and 9 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
  4. Apr 27, 2026SenateFloor
    Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.
  5. Apr 22, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
  6. Apr 21, 2026SenateCommittee
    Reported favorably.
  7. Apr 14, 2026SenateCommittee
    Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary C.
  8. Apr 13, 2026Senate
    Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.
  9. Apr 9, 2026HouseFloor
    Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 75, nays 25. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
  10. Apr 8, 2026House
    Scheduled for floor debate on 04/09/2026.
  11. Apr 7, 2026HouseFloor
    Read by title, amended, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.
  12. Apr 1, 2026House
    Reported with amendments (10-2).
  13. Mar 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
  14. Feb 27, 2026House
    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.
  15. Feb 24, 2026House
    Prefiled.
  16. Feb 24, 2026HouseCommittee
    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 31 more sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Premises Defense

The bill explicitly extends specific self-defense and property protection frameworks previously reserved for dwellings and businesses to include churches and places of worship.

Connected Entities

Kimberly Coates, Josh Carlson, Mike Bayham and 9 more
PersonKimberly Coates“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 294”Map →
PersonJosh Carlson“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 294”Map →
PersonMike Bayham“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 294”Map →
PersonBeryl Amedée“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 294”Map →
PersonDewith Carrier“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 294”Map →
PersonKim Carver“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 294”Map →
locationLouisiana“State jurisdiction enacting the legislation”Map →
PersonGabe Firment“Primary sponsor of House Bill No. 294”Map →
PersonStephanie Berault“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 294”Map →
PersonEmily Chenevert“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 294”Map →
PersonBeth Billings“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 294”Map →
PersonTony Bacala“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 294”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record