POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

North Carolina HB 648 clarifies nonrelative placement timing and relative preference rules for juveniles

Original title: Disposition Placement/Findings of Fact.

Last action · April 30, 2025: Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate (Senate action)Sponsors: Stevens and 3 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

North Carolina HB 648 requires courts and departments of social services to prioritize relative placements and make specific findings of fact before considering nonrelative placements for juveniles in or , effective October 1, 2025.

Why it matters

Changes the legal standards and procedural requirements for child welfare agencies and family courts handling abused, neglected, or dependent juveniles, directly affecting placement decisions and timelines for relatives and foster care providers.

Background
  • North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 7B governs the state's juvenile code, including abuse, neglect, dependency, and custody proceedings. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Juveniles

Juveniles subject to nonsecure custody or disposition have placement priorities shifted toward relatives and sibling groups.

Directly affected

County Departments of Social Services

Social services departments must conduct due diligence to notify adult relatives within 30 days and make reasonable efforts to keep sibling groups together.

Directly affected

Relatively Qualified Caregivers

Relatives receive statutory priority for home placement and care supervision of juveniles over nonrelatives.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What must a court do before placing a juvenile with a nonrelative?
The court must make a determination supported by findings of fact that there is either no relative willing and able to provide proper care in a safe home, or that placement with a relative would be contrary to the juvenile's best interest.
How quickly must social services notify relatives after a child is removed?
The county department of social services must use due diligence to identify and notify adult relatives and persons with legal custody of a sibling within 30 days after the initial order removing custody.
Are there specific rules regarding sibling placements?
Yes, the director of social services must make reasonable efforts to place removed sibling groups in the same home, or otherwise ensure frequent sibling visitation and ongoing interaction unless it is contrary to their safety or well-being.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

14 actions
  1. Apr 30, 2025Senate
    Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
  2. Apr 30, 2025Senate
    Passed 1st Reading
  3. Apr 30, 2025Senate
    Regular Message Received From House
  4. Apr 30, 2025House
    Regular Message Sent To Senate
  5. Apr 29, 2025House
    Passed 3rd Reading
  6. Apr 29, 2025House
    Passed 2nd Reading
Show 8 earlier actions
  1. Apr 28, 2025House
    Placed On Cal For 04/29/2025
  2. Apr 28, 2025House
    Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)
  3. Apr 28, 2025House
    Reptd Fav
  4. Apr 15, 2025House
    Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
  5. Apr 15, 2025House
    Reptd Fav Com Substitute
  6. Apr 2, 2025House
    Ref to the Com on Judiciary 2, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
  7. Apr 2, 2025House
    Passed 1st Reading
  8. Apr 1, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Outcome not reportedHouse4/29/2025North Carolina LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Second Reading

Total

115

Yes
105
No
3
Present
0
Not voting
7
Abstain
0

How they voted (115)

91 more members
Mike SchietzeltParty not recordedyes
Cody HuneycuttParty not recordedyes
Brenden JonesParty not recordedyes
Ed GoodwinParty not recordedyes
John BellParty not recordedyes
Allen BuansiParty not recordedyes
Jay AdamsParty not recordedyes
Robert ReivesParty not recordedabsent
Garland PierceParty not recordedyes
Julia HowardParty not recordedyes
Tracy ClarkParty not recordedyes
Dudley GreeneParty not recordedyes
Dante PittmanParty not recordedyes
Brian TurnerParty not recordedyes
Mark BrodyParty not recordedyes
Tim ReederParty not recordedyes
Bryan CohnParty not recordedyes
Jake JohnsonParty not recordedyes
Phil ShepardParty not recordedyes
Julia GreenfieldParty not recordedyes
Dean ArpParty not recordedyes
John BlustParty not recordedyes
Kanika BrownParty not recordedabsent
Carla CunninghamParty not recordedyes
Sam WatfordParty not recordedyes
Todd CarverParty not recordedyes
Ray JeffersParty not recordedabsent
Kelly HastingsParty not recordedyes
Pricey HarrisonParty not recordedno
Alan BransonParty not recordedyes
Karl GillespieParty not recordedyes
Laura BuddParty not recordedyes
Abe JonesParty not recordedyes
Brian BiggsParty not recordedyes
Kyle HallParty not recordedyes
Gloristine BrownParty not recordedyes
Ray PickettParty not recordedyes
Larry PottsParty not recordedyes
Matthew WinslowParty not recordedyes
Larry StricklandParty not recordedyes
Aisha DewParty not recordedyes
John TorbettParty not recordedyes
William BrissonParty not recordedyes
David WillisParty not recordedyes
Maria CervaniaParty not recordedyes
Renée PriceParty not recordedyes
von HaefenParty not recordedyes
Sarah CrawfordParty not recordedyes
Amos QuickParty not recordedyes
Diane WheatleyParty not recordedyes
Howard PennyParty not recordedyes
Terry BrownParty not recordedyes
Jennifer BalkcomParty not recordedyes
Paul ScottParty not recordedyes
Tricia CothamParty not recordedyes
Jimmy DixonParty not recordedyes
Keith KidwellParty not recordedyes
Stephen RossParty not recordedabsent
Tim LongestParty not recordedyes
Reece PyrtleParty not recordedyes
Marcia MoreyParty not recordedno
Zack HawkinsParty not recordedyes
Mark PlessParty not recordedyes
Frank IlerParty not recordedyes
Allen ChesserParty not recordedyes
Jeff McNeelyParty not recordedyes
Deb ButlerParty not recordedabsent
Phil RubinParty not recordedyes
Jonathan AlmondParty not recordedyes
Wyatt GableParty not recordedabsent
Ya LiuParty not recordedyes
Lindsey PratherParty not recordedyes
Brian EchevarriaParty not recordedyes
John SaulsParty not recordedyes
Neal JacksonParty not recordedyes
Jordan LopezParty not recordednot voting
Ted DavisParty not recordedyes
Charles SmithParty not recordedyes
Donna WhiteParty not recordedyes
Nasif MajeedParty not recordedyes
Dennis RiddellParty not recordedyes
Frances JacksonParty not recordedyes
Beth Gardner HelfrichParty not recordedyes
Erin ParéParty not recordedyes
Bill WardParty not recordedyes
Harry WarrenParty not recordedyes
Joe PikeParty not recordedyes
Charlie MillerParty not recordedyes
Amber BakerParty not recordedyes
Chris HumphreyParty not recordedyes
Blair EddinsParty not recordedyes

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Mandatory Relative Placement Findings

The bill tightens procedural hurdles for nonrelative placements by explicitly requiring documented factual findings that relative options are unavailable or unsuitable.

Connected Entities

Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children, Carla Cunningham, Shelly Willingham and 4 more
OrganizationInterstate Compact on the Placement of Children“Governs placement of juveniles with relatives outside of North Carolina”Map →
PersonCarla Cunningham“Cosponsor of House Bill 648”Map →
PersonShelly Willingham“Cosponsor of House Bill 648”Map →
otherHoward M. Metzenbaum Multiethnic Placement Act of 1994“Federal law applicable to juvenile placements”Map →
PersonStevens“Primary sponsor of House Bill 648”Map →
otherIndian Child Welfare Act“Federal law applicable to juvenile placements”Map →
PersonGarland Pierce“Cosponsor of House Bill 648”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record