POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Iowa Senate File 316 authorizes dual esthetics and nail technology study and instructor paid services

Original title: A bill for an act relating to the practice of barbering and cosmetology arts and sciences, including schools of barbering and cosmetology arts and sciences and a combined course of study for the practice of esthetics and nail technology.(See SF 551 .)

Last action · May 12, 2025: Withdrawn. S.J. 965 .Sponsor: Jeff Reichman

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

This bill allows licensed barbering and cosmetology instructors to perform paid services at their schools while not teaching, permits dual study for and licenses, and exempts licensed schools from separate establishment licensing.

Why it matters

Changes licensing rules, establishment requirements, and allowed commercial activities for cosmetology schools and instructors in Iowa.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Barbering and cosmetology instructors

Instructors are permitted to perform services for compensation at the school while not instructing students.

Directly affected

Students of esthetics and nail technology

Students gain the option to simultaneously study for licenses in both esthetics and nail technology.

Directly affected

Schools of barbering and cosmetology arts and sciences

Schools are exempt from obtaining a separate license as an establishment.

Key Facts

  • Instructors employed by a school of barbering and cosmetology arts and sciences may perform paid services at the school while not instructing students.
  • The board may approve a course of study allowing students to simultaneously study for esthetics and nail technology licenses.
  • Students partially completing a combined course of study are ineligible for individual licensure unless they complete all requirements for that specific practice.
  • The board is prohibited from approving study programs with substantially lower requirements than existing similar licenses or programs that are duplicative of currently operating ones.
Show all 5 facts
  • Licensed schools of barbering and cosmetology where students or licensees practice are exempt from separate establishment licensing requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can cosmetology school instructors perform paid services at the school?
Yes, instructors may perform barbering and cosmetology services for compensation at the school while they are not actively instructing students.
Does a licensed cosmetology school need a separate establishment license?
No, a licensed school of barbering and cosmetology arts and sciences is exempt from licensing as a separate establishment.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Withdrawn.

Procedural history

14 actions
  1. May 12, 2025Senate
    Withdrawn. S.J. 965 .
  2. May 12, 2025Senate
    HF 711 substituted. S.J. 963 .
  3. May 12, 2025SenateFloor
    Amendment S-3142 adopted. S.J. 963 .
  4. May 8, 2025Senate
    Amendment S-3142 filed. S.J. 946 .
  5. Apr 3, 2025Senate
    Placed on calendar under unfinished business. S.J. 689 .
  6. Mar 18, 2025Senate
    Attached to HF 711 . S.J. 554 .
Show 8 earlier actions
  1. Mar 6, 2025Senate
    Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 442 .
  2. Mar 6, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced, placed on calendar. S.J. 431 .
  3. Mar 6, 2025Senate
    Committee report approving bill, renumbered as SF 551 . S.J. 442 .
  4. Mar 4, 2025Iowa Legislature
    Subcommittee recommends passage.
  5. Feb 26, 2025Iowa Legislature
    Subcommittee Meeting: 03/03/2025 2:30PM Room 217 Conference Room.
  6. Feb 25, 2025Senate
    Subcommittee reassigned: Reichman, Blake, and Campbell. S.J. 356 .
  7. Feb 20, 2025Senate
    Subcommittee: Reichman, Campbell, and Celsi. S.J. 326 .
  8. Feb 13, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced, referred to State Government. S.J. 267 .

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Jeff Reichman, General Assembly of the State of Iowa
PersonJeff Reichman“Bill sponsor in the upper house”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly of the State of Iowa“Legislative body enacting the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.iowa.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 35)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record