POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah SB 245 restricts impact fee service areas and revenue spending

Original title: Impact Fee Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: Senate/ filedSponsor: Cal Musselman

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Utah SB 245 prohibits local political subdivisions from designating an entire municipality or county as a single starting May 6, 2026. The bill also restricts how revenue generated by impact fees can be expended and tightens accounting requirements.

Why it matters

Local governments and private utilities must alter how they map s for development fees, limiting broad multi-facility zones, and must track fee expenditures more rigidly by specific project types within a six-year window.

Background
  • Impact fees are one-time charges levied by local governments on new developments to help pay for public infrastructure expansion required by growth. context
  • Calvin R. Musselman serves in the Utah Senate, representing District 9. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

local political subdivisions

Counties, municipalities, and special districts must redraw service area boundaries, separate ledger accounts, and restrict impact fee spending to specific project types.

Directly affected

developers

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an impact fee under this legislation?
An is a payment of money imposed upon new development activity as a condition of development approval to mitigate the impact of the new development on public infrastructure.
How long does a local government have to spend collected impact fees?
A local political subdivision must generally expend or an within six years after it is collected, unless it identifies an extraordinary and compelling reason in writing along with an absolute expenditure date.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the Senate floor.

Procedural history

18 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ strike enacting clause
  3. Mar 4, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd Reading Calendar to Rules
  4. Feb 24, 2026Senate
    Senate/ circled
  5. Feb 24, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  6. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
Show 12 earlier actions
  1. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Senate/ comm rpt/ amended
  2. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  3. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Amendment Recommendation
  4. Feb 6, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0245
  5. Feb 6, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0245
  6. Feb 4, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  7. Feb 4, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  8. Feb 4, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
  9. Feb 3, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0245
  10. Feb 3, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0245
  11. Feb 3, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  12. Feb 3, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Prohibition of Jurisdiction-Wide Service Areas

The bill eliminates the practice of designating an entire municipality or county as a single impact fee service area.

Connected Entities

Calvin R. Musselman
PersonCalvin R. Musselman“Chief Sponsor of SB 245”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record