The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.South Dakota HB 1176 Prohibits Revoking Pre-Trial Release Solely for Inability to Pay Sobriety Program Costs
Last action · March 9, 2026: Placed on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6Sponsors: Peri Pourier and 4 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
South Dakota HB 1176 prohibits courts from revoking a defendant's bond, , or jailing them solely for failing to pay 24/7 sobriety program costs, unless a willful failure to pay with the present ability to pay is established. The measure amends existing statutes to clarify conditions for pre-trial release and adjust reimbursements from the state's to cover county expenses when defendants cannot pay.
Defendants participating in pre-trial sobriety programs gain legal protection against being jailed for unpaid fees unless they have the financial capability to pay, while counties receive statutory backing for cost reimbursements from the state treasury.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Defendants participating in the 24/7 sobriety program
Defendants gain protection from having bond revoked or facing jail time for unpaid program fees unless the court finds they have the ability to pay.
Counties
Counties are eligible for reimbursements from the state 24/7 sobriety fund for program costs and expenses when defendants lack the ability to pay.
Office of the Attorney General
The office maintains and administers the 24/7 sobriety fund and may accept donations, grants, and fees for deposit.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I be jailed if I cannot afford to pay for the 24/7 sobriety program while on pre-trial release?
Who is responsible for proving whether a defendant could pay the sobriety program fees?
What happens to program costs that a defendant fails to pay before their criminal case is resolved?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · on the Senate floor.
Procedural history
13 actions- Mar 9, 2026SenatePlaced on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6
- Mar 5, 2026SenateReport out of committee without recommendation as amended
- Mar 5, 2026SenateCommitteeDo Pass Amended
- Mar 5, 2026SenateMotion to amend
- Mar 5, 2026SenateScheduled for hearing
- Mar 3, 2026SenateCommitteeReferred to
Show 7 earlier actions
- Mar 3, 2026SenateScheduled for hearing
- Feb 11, 2026SenateIntroducedFirst read in Senate and referred to
- Feb 10, 2026HouseFloorDo Pass
- Feb 9, 2026HouseCertified uncontested, placed on consent
- Feb 9, 2026HouseCommitteeDo Pass
- Feb 9, 2026HouseScheduled for hearing
- Jan 28, 2026HouseIntroducedFirst read in House and referred to
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Do Pass
Total
70
- Yes
- 66
- No
- 0
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 4
How they voted (1)
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
sdlegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
- Controversy25Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
