POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Louisiana House Bill 577 adjusts insurer penalty calculations for arbitrary claim denials

Original title: INSURANCE: Provides relative to penalties calculated on the amount found to be due from the insurer to the insured

Last action · March 31, 2026: Read by title, returned to the calendar.Sponsor: Brian Glorioso

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Louisiana House Bill 577 updates how penalty damages are calculated when insurers fail to pay claims in a timely manner without probable cause, allowing a penalty of up to 50 percent of the amount due or the difference after partial payment. The bill applies to property and non-life insurance policies governed by R.S. 22:1892.

Why it matters

Policyholders disputing delayed or unpaid claims may see altered statutory penalty caps when insurers act arbitrarily, affecting potential recoveries beyond the base claim amount.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

insurers

Insurers face revised statutory penalty parameters up to fifty percent for arbitrary and capricious claim handling.

Directly affected

insured policyholders

Policyholders pursuing disputed claims may be awarded penalty damages calculated under the updated statutory cap.

Key Facts

  • Authorizes a penalty of up to fifty percent of the amount found to be due from an insurer to an insured when payment failure is arbitrary, capricious, or without probable cause.
  • Applies similarly when a partial payment or tender has been made, calculating the penalty as up to fifty percent of the difference between the amount paid and the amount found to be due.
  • Includes provisions for proven economic damages sustained as a result of the breach, or one thousand dollars, whichever is greater, along with reasonable attorney fees and costs.
  • Prohibits insurers from using awarded penalties in computing past or prospective loss experience for rate setting or rate filings.

Frequently Asked Questions

What triggers the insurer penalty under this bill?
The penalty is triggered when an insurer fails to make payment or a settlement offer within thirty days after receiving satisfactory proofs, and that failure is found to be .
Can insurers use these penalties to raise future rates?
No, the bill explicitly prohibits insurers from using the awarded penalties when computing past or prospective loss experience for rate filings.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House.

Procedural history

8 actions
  1. Mar 31, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, returned to the calendar.
  2. Mar 30, 2026House
    Scheduled for floor debate on 03/31/2026.
  3. Mar 26, 2026HouseFloor
    Read by title, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.
  4. Mar 25, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported favorably (10-6).
  5. Mar 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Insurance.
  6. Feb 27, 2026House
    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.
Show 2 earlier actions
  1. Feb 26, 2026House
    Prefiled.
  2. Feb 26, 2026HouseCommittee
    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Insurance.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Brian Glorioso
PersonBrian Glorioso“Representative who introduced House Bill 577”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 50)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record