POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Proposed 'Stopping Harmful and Outrageous Torts Act' (SA 6467)

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6467

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This Senate amendment proposes to expand legal immunity for firearm and ammunition manufacturers, sellers, and trade associations against most civil lawsuits. It would require the immediate dismissal of pending cases and preempt state and local laws that allow such lawsuits, while establishing new procedures for moving these cases to federal court.

Why it matters

If enacted, this amendment would restrict the ability of individuals and governments to sue firearm companies for damages related to the criminal misuse of their products, potentially ending ongoing litigation and preventing future state-level legal actions.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Firearm manufacturers and sellers

They receive expanded legal immunity from civil lawsuits and the right to recover attorney's fees if they prevail in asserting that immunity.

Directly affected

State and local governments

Their ability to pass or enforce laws allowing civil actions against the firearm industry is preempted by this federal amendment.

Directly affected

Plaintiffs in pending civil lawsuits

Their pending cases against firearm industry members would be subject to immediate dismissal under the new provisions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this amendment stop all lawsuits against gun companies?
No. It provides exceptions for certain claims, such as those involving product defects, breach of contract, or cases where a manufacturer knowingly violated specific federal laws.
Can a state government still sue a gun manufacturer under this law?
The amendment explicitly prohibits foreign states or governments from bringing such actions and preempts state laws that would allow for civil actions related to the criminal misuse of firearms.
What happens to lawsuits currently pending in state courts?
The amendment mandates that any pending '' must be immediately dismissed by the court.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Federal Preemption

The amendment significantly broadens federal control over civil litigation by explicitly preempting state and local laws, a shift from the existing Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.

Connected Entities

Shelley M Capito, Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, Mr. Ricketts and 6 more
PersonShelley M Capito“Co-sponsor.”Map →
otherProtection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act“The existing law being amended.”Map →
PersonMr. Ricketts“Co-sponsor.”Map →
PersonMrs. Blackburn“Co-sponsor.”Map →
PersonMr. Grassley“Co-sponsor.”Map →
PersonMs. Lummis“Co-sponsor.”Map →
PersonMr. Budd“Co-sponsor.”Map →
PersonSteve Daines“Co-sponsor.”Map →
PersonMr. Cornyn“Lead sponsor of the amendment.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance90
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy95
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record