POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCourts →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia Bill HB 5427 Establishes Criminal Penalties and Civil Remedies for Doxxing

Original title: To prohibit the malicious publication of personally identifiable information with intent to harass, intimidate, threaten, stalk, or facilitate harm.

Last action · February 10, 2026: To House JudiciarySponsors: Bill Ridenour and 10 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

House Bill 5427 creates the "Anti-Doxxing and Privacy Protection Act," prohibiting the malicious publication of with intent to harass, threaten, or stalk. The measure establishes misdemeanor and felony criminal penalties, civil remedies for victims, and procedures for redacting personal information from government records, effective April 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Residents face new criminal liability and civil penalties for publishing personal details online without consent, while victims gain the right to sue for damages and request record redactions from state and local agencies.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Law-enforcement officers, healthcare workers, and public officials

Violations involving these public-service professionals and their immediate family members constitute an aggravated offense carrying higher prison terms and fines.

Directly affected

Journalists and academic researchers

Good-faith reporting and research concerning matters of legitimate public concern are explicitly excluded from the bill's prohibitions.

Directly affected

State and local government agencies

Agencies must establish procedures for individuals to request the redaction of personally identifiable information from publicly accessible records.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is considered "doxxing" under this bill?
Doxxing is defined as the knowing and intentional publication or transmission of another person's without consent, with the intent to harass, threaten, stalk, or facilitate third-party violence.
Are journalists and news organizations exempt from these rules?
Yes. The bill exempts good-faith news reporting, commentary, and academic research concerning matters of legitimate public concern, provided the disclosure is not made with intent to facilitate harassment or harm and reasonable steps are taken to minimize unnecessary risk.
Can individuals remove their personal information from government records?
Yes. State and local government agencies must establish procedures allowing individuals to request the redaction or withholding of from publicly accessible records upon a showing of a credible safety risk.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 10, 2026HouseCommittee
    To House Judiciary
  2. Feb 10, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House
  3. Feb 10, 2026HouseCommittee
    To Judiciary
  4. Feb 10, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Creation of Specific Anti-Doxxing Criminal Statute

The legislation fills perceived gaps in existing state law by establishing a dedicated criminal and civil framework specifically targeting the malicious publication of personal data.

Connected Entities

West Virginia Freedom of Information Act
otherWest Virginia Freedom of Information Act“Statute providing for lawful disclosures of public records.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 80)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record