POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Missouri House Bill 2061 Prohibits Antisemitic Discrimination in Public Schools and Universities

Original title: PROHIBITING ANTISEMITIC ACTIONS

Last action · April 23, 2026: Delivered to Secretary of State (G)Sponsors: George Hruza and 11 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Missouri HB 2061 requires public K-12 schools and public higher education institutions to treat antisemitic harassment and discrimination the same as racial discrimination, incorporate the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism into codes of conduct, and establish formal reporting procedures for complaints.

Why it matters

Students and staff at public educational institutions gain explicit protections under state law against antisemitic discrimination, with mandatory reporting requirements and timelines for schools to correct violations before state agencies escalate complaints to federal authorities.

Background
  • The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) adopted its Working Definition of Antisemitism in May 2016. context
  • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

public school students and employees

Students and staff are granted explicit protections against antisemitic discrimination and harassment under the same standards as racial discrimination.

Directly affected

public educational institutions

Schools and postsecondary institutions must update codes of conduct, integrate the IHRA definition, establish formal reporting processes, and investigate complaints.

Directly affected

Title VI coordinators

Coordinators at state education departments are required to establish reporting processes, investigate complaints, issue determinations, and compile annual reports.

Key Facts

  • Educational institutions must treat harassment or discrimination motivated by antisemitism in an identical manner to discrimination motivated by race.
  • Public schools and colleges must integrate the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's working definition of antisemitism into student, faculty, and employee codes of conduct.
  • Prohibited conduct includes actions that physically impede individuals or create an atmosphere of fear or intimidation.
  • Criticism of Israel that is similar to criticism toward any other country is explicitly not construed to be antisemitic.
Show all 9 facts
  • Nothing in the bill diminishes rights protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution or the Missouri Constitution.
  • K-12 educational institutions must report incidents and complaints of antisemitic discrimination to the Title VI coordinator at the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
  • Postsecondary institutions must report complaints to the Title VI coordinator of the coordinating board for higher education under the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development.
  • If an institution fails to address determined issues within thirty days of written notice, the state department must report the determination to the U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice.
  • Title VI coordinators must compile an annual report on complaints, publish it on their website, and submit it to the General Assembly before July first of each year.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the bill define antisemitism?
The bill adopts the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) Working Definition of Antisemitism, including its contemporary examples adopted on May 26, 2016.
Does criticizing Israel violate this law?
No. The bill explicitly states that criticism of Israel that is similar to criticism toward any other country shall not be construed to be antisemitic.
What happens if a school fails to address an antisemitism complaint?
The educational institution is given thirty days to address issues after written notice. If it fails to take necessary actions, the state department must report the determination to the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Justice under .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

53 actions
  1. Apr 23, 2026House
    Delivered to Secretary of State (G)
  2. Apr 23, 2026Governor of MissouriEnrolled
    Approved by Governor (G)
  3. Apr 15, 2026Governor of Missouri
    Delivered to Governor
  4. Apr 15, 2026Senate
    Signed by President Pro Tem (S)
  5. Apr 15, 2026House
    Signed by House Speaker (H)
  6. Apr 13, 2026House
    House Message (H)
Show 47 earlier actions
  1. Apr 9, 2026House
    Truly Agreed To and Finally Passed
  2. Apr 9, 2026House
    House Adopts (H)
  3. Apr 9, 2026House
    Taken Up
  4. Apr 9, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported Do Pass (H)
  5. Apr 9, 2026HouseCommittee
    Voted Do Pass (H)
  6. Apr 9, 2026House
    Executive Session Completed (H)
  7. Apr 8, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Fiscal Review(H)
  8. Apr 8, 2026House
    Reported to the House with... (H)
  9. Apr 8, 2026SenateFloor
    Third Read and Passed with Amendments (S)
  10. Apr 8, 2026Senate
    SS Adopted (S)
  11. Apr 8, 2026House
    SS Offered
  12. Apr 8, 2026Senate
    Taken Up for Third Reading (S)
  13. Apr 7, 2026SenateCommittee
    Reported Do Pass (S)
  14. Mar 11, 2026SenateCommittee
    Voted Do Pass (S)
  15. Mar 11, 2026Senate
    Executive Session Held (S)
  16. Mar 10, 2026House
    Executive Session Scheduled
  17. Mar 9, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred: Fiscal Oversight(S)
  18. Mar 9, 2026SenateCommittee
    Reported Do Pass (S)
  19. Mar 9, 2026SenateCommittee
    Voted Do Pass (S)
  20. Mar 9, 2026Senate
    Executive Session Held (S)
  21. Mar 4, 2026Senate
    Public Hearing Held (S)
  22. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Public Hearing Scheduled (S)
  23. Feb 26, 2026SenateCommittee
    Second read and referred: General Laws(S)
  24. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Reported to the Senate and First Read (S)
  25. Feb 16, 2026HouseFloor
    Third Read and Passed (H)
  26. Feb 16, 2026House
    Taken Up for Third Reading (H)
  27. Feb 16, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported Do Pass (H)
  28. Feb 16, 2026HouseCommittee
    Voted Do Pass (H)
  29. Feb 16, 2026House
    Executive Session Completed (H)
  30. Feb 12, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Fiscal Review(H)
  31. Feb 11, 2026House
    Perfected with Amendments (H)
  32. Feb 11, 2026House
    Title of Bill - Agreed To
  33. Feb 11, 2026House
    Taken Up for Perfection (H)
  34. Feb 9, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported Do Pass (H)
  35. Feb 9, 2026HouseCommittee
    Voted Do Pass (H)
  36. Feb 9, 2026House
    Executive Session Completed (H)
  37. Jan 29, 2026House
    Action Postponed (H)
  38. Jan 29, 2026House
    Executive Session Continued
  39. Jan 22, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Rules - Legislative(H)
  40. Jan 21, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported Do Pass (H)
  41. Jan 20, 2026HouseCommittee
    Voted Do Pass (H)
  42. Jan 20, 2026House
    Executive Session Completed (H)
  43. Jan 12, 2026House
    Public Hearing Completed (H)
  44. Jan 8, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  45. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  46. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  47. Dec 1, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Alignment with Federal Civil Rights Framework

The bill bridges state-level educational governance with federal Title VI enforcement by requiring formal state-level reporting to federal departments when local institutions fail to comply.

Connected Entities

United States Department of Justice, coordinating board for higher education, General Assembly and 4 more
OrganizationUnited States Department of Justice“Federal agency enforcing Title VI regulations”Map →
Organizationcoordinating board for higher education“State board supervising postsecondary education”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body enacting the bill”Map →
Organizationdepartment of higher education and workforce development“State department housing higher education coordination”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Department of Education“Federal agency enforcing Title VI regulations”Map →
OrganizationInternational Holocaust Remembrance Alliance“Source of the Working Definition of Antisemitism”Map →
Organizationdepartment of elementary and secondary education“State agency receiving K-12 complaints and reports”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record