POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut requires executive branch agencies to develop annual performance plans and regular OPM evaluations starting in 2027

Original title: AN ACT REQUIRING ANNUAL STATE AGENCY PERFORMANCE PLANS.

Last action · May 6, 2026: House Calendar Number 577Sponsors: Paul Cicarella and 3 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

To require executive branch state agencies to develop and implement annual performance plans.

Why it matters

The measure establishes new administrative and reporting requirements across state government, backed by an estimated one-time cost of up to $3 million for guideline development and ongoing personnel expenses for OPM oversight.

Background
  • The General Assembly is the legislative body of the State of Connecticut responsible for enacting state laws. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

state agencies

State agencies must develop annual performance plans, submit progress reports, and participate in OPM performance evaluations.

Directly affected

Office of Policy and Management

OPM must establish plan guidelines, provide training and technical assistance, receive agency reports, and institute biennial performance evaluations.

Directly affected

General Assembly joint standing committees

Committees must receive agency performance reports and hold hearings where agency executive authorities present their plans.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When do state agencies have to start developing performance plans?
Each state agency must develop and implement an annual performance plan outlining its strategic and operational goals no later than July 1, 2027.
Who reviews the performance plans and progress reports?
Reports are submitted to the Office of Policy and Management (OPM) and the relevant of the General Assembly, which must hold a hearing for the agency's executive authority to present the plan.
Are all state agencies subject to OPM reporting and evaluation?
No. The Office of State Ethics, Freedom of Information Commission, State Elections Enforcement Commission, State Contracting Standards Board, Office of Governmental Accountability, and Public Utilities Regulatory Authority submit reports only to their legislative committee of and are exempt from OPM evaluations.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the Senate · on the House floor.

Procedural history

13 actions
  1. May 6, 2026House
    House Calendar Number 577
  2. May 6, 2026House
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, House
  3. May 5, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Transmitted Pursuant To Joint Rule 17
  4. May 5, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate Passed
  5. Apr 2, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 362
  6. Apr 2, 2026Senate
    Senate Calendar Number 249
Show 7 earlier actions
  1. Apr 2, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  2. Apr 2, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  3. Mar 27, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/01/26 5:00 PM
  4. Mar 17, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
  5. Mar 17, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable Substitute
  6. Mar 6, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 03/10
  7. Mar 5, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Government Oversight

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Institutionalization of Agency Performance Management

The legislation formalizes statewide executive agency planning by setting statutory deadlines for strategic goal-setting and mandatory biennial evaluations by OPM.

Connected Entities

Public Utilities Regulatory Authority, Freedom of Information Commission, State Contracting Standards Board and 5 more
OrganizationPublic Utilities Regulatory Authority“Exempt from submitting performance reports to OPM; reports only to its legislati”Map →
OrganizationFreedom of Information Commission“Exempt from submitting performance reports to OPM; reports only to its legislati”Map →
OrganizationState Contracting Standards Board“Exempt from submitting performance reports to OPM; reports only to its legislati”Map →
OrganizationState Comptroller“Administers central fringe benefit accounts related to staffing costs.”Map →
OrganizationOffice of Policy and Management“Responsible for establishing guidelines, providing training, receiving agency re”Map →
OrganizationOffice of Governmental Accountability“Exempt from submitting performance reports to OPM; reports only to its legislati”Map →
OrganizationOffice of State Ethics“Exempt from submitting performance reports to OPM; reports only to its legislati”Map →
OrganizationState Elections Enforcement Commission“Exempt from submitting performance reports to Opm; reports only to its legislati”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record