POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

North Dakota House Bill 1389 Authorizes Cities and Counties to Levy Infrastructure Fees via Utility Bills

Original title: A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact sections 11-11-55.1, 40-22-01.3, and 57-15-41 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to infrastructure fees levied by cities and counties, and the exemption of infrastructure fees from levy limitations.

Last action · March 26, 2025: Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 3 nays 44Sponsors: Jason Dockter and 3 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

North Dakota House Bill 1389 allows counties and municipalities to levy and collect monthly infrastructure fees on utility bills in lieu of , subject to a public hearing and a majority-protest veto by account holders. The measure also exempts tax levies for infrastructure fees from statutory tax levy limitations for political subdivisions.

Why it matters

Utility account holders in participating counties and municipalities face potential new monthly infrastructure fees on their utility bills, balanced by the right to halt proposed projects if a majority of account holders submit formal protests within a window of at least thirty days.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Utility account holders

Utility account holders receive notices of proposed infrastructure zones, gain the ability to protest proposed fees, and may be assessed monthly infrastructure fees on their utility bills.

Directly affected

Counties and municipalities

Counties and municipalities are granted the authority to establish infrastructure zones, levy utility-bill infrastructure fees, and collect green field special assessments.

Directly affected

Commercial property owners

Commercial property owners are subject to infrastructure fees at a rate capped at no more than two times the residential rate.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can utility account holders stop a proposed infrastructure fee project?
Utility account holders can stop a proposed project by submitting a protest form within the specified deadline (at least thirty days from the notice) if a majority of account holders in the proposed zone do so.
Can commercial properties be charged a higher infrastructure fee than residential properties?
Yes, but the rate assessed to commercial property cannot be more than two times the rate assessed to residential property.
What are the funds collected from the infrastructure fee allowed to be used for?
The money collected from the municipal infrastructure fee must not be used for any purpose other than infrastructure maintenance costs.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Failed in the Senate.

Procedural history

10 actions
  1. Mar 26, 2025Senate
    Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 3 nays 44
  2. Mar 25, 2025SenateCommittee
    Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 5 1 0
  3. Mar 12, 2025SenateCommittee
    Committee Hearing 09:00
  4. Feb 17, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced, first reading, referred Finance and Taxation Committee
  5. Feb 13, 2025Senate
    Received from House
  6. Feb 12, 2025HouseFloor
    Second reading, passed, yeas 91 nays 0
Show 4 earlier actions
  1. Feb 11, 2025HouseCommittee
    Amendment adopted, placed on calendar
  2. Feb 10, 2025HouseCommittee
    Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 11 2 1
  3. Jan 29, 2025HouseCommittee
    Committee Hearing 09:30
  4. Jan 13, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, first reading, referred Finance and Taxation Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Alternative to General Special Assessments

The legislation establishes an alternative mechanism for funding local infrastructure through utility bill fees rather than traditional property-based special assessments.

Connected Entities

North Dakota Century Code
OrganizationNorth Dakota Century Code“Statutory code being amended by House Bill 1389”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record