POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on Federal Nominations (July 2018)

Original title: PENDING NOMINATIONS

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing represents a formal step in the federal confirmation process for individuals who will oversee federal employee appeals and local judicial proceedings in Washington, D.C.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Federal Employees

The nominees for the Merit Systems Protection Board will adjudicate appeals regarding federal employment actions.

District of Columbia Residents

The nominee for the Superior Court of the District of Columbia will preside over local judicial matters.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs held a hearing to review four presidential s. The nominees include three candidates for the and one candidate for the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on July 19, 2018, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  • Dennis D. Kirk was nominated to serve as Chairman of the Merit Systems Protection Board.
  • Julia A. Clark was nominated to serve as a Member of the Merit Systems Protection Board.
  • Andrew F. Maunz was nominated to serve as a Member of the Merit Systems Protection Board.
  • Carmen G. McLean was nominated to serve as an Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
  • The committee received biographical, financial, and ethics documentation for all four nominees.
  • The committee received letters of support for the Merit Systems Protection Board nominees.
  • The committee received letters of opposition regarding the nominations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Merit Systems Protection Board?
The is an independent, quasi-judicial agency in the executive branch that serves as the guardian of federal merit systems.
What happens after this hearing?
The committee reviews the testimony and documentation provided before deciding whether to report the s to the full Senate for a confirmation vote.

Why It Matters

This hearing represents a formal step in the federal confirmation process for individuals who will oversee federal employee appeals and local judicial proceedings in Washington, D.C.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

MSPB Vacancies

The hearing addressed the simultaneous nomination of three members to the Merit Systems Protection Board, indicating a period of significant leadership vacancy at the agency.

Connected Entities

personDennis D. KirkNominee for Chairman of the Merit Systems Protection BoardMap →
personJulia A. ClarkNominee for Member of the Merit Systems Protection BoardMap →
personAndrew F. MaunzNominee for Member of the Merit Systems Protection BoardMap →
organizationCommittee on Homeland Security and Governmental AffairsSenate committee conducting the hearingMap →
personJames LankfordU.S. Senator presiding over the hearingMap →
personCarmen G. McLeanNominee for Associate Judge, Superior Court of the District of ColumbiaMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record