POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HB 1517FLORIDA · STATEWIDESession 2026Died in Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee

The Data Center Transparency Act (HB 1517)

Original title: Approval of Data Center Facilities

January 9, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently Died in Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Jan 15, 2026House
    Now in Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
  2. Jan 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to Commerce Committee
  3. Jan 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to State Affairs Committee
  4. Jan 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
  5. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
  6. Jan 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

The bill aimed to ensure that local residents and businesses are informed about the resource demands and environmental footprint of large data centers, potentially impacting how these facilities are approved and taxed in their communities.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Data center operators

Must comply with new reporting requirements, noise standards, and disclosure mandates or face fines and loss of tax incentives.

Local residents and businesses

Would receive written notice of nearby data center projects and have access to detailed environmental and resource usage data.

Department of Environmental Protection

Required to collect, host, and publish data center disclosures on its website.

What changed

Current stage: Died in Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill would have required data centers to publicly disclose detailed information about their energy use, water consumption, waste management, and environmental impact. It also mandated that these facilities notify nearby residents and businesses of their operations and prohibited them from claiming trade secret exemptions to avoid transparency.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What information would data centers have to share?
They would have to disclose energy sources, water consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, waste management plans, environmental impact studies, and any economic incentives or tax credits received.
How would residents know if a data center is being built nearby?
The bill requires written notice to be sent to all landowners and renters within a 5-mile radius of a proposed facility.
Can data centers keep this information private as a 'trade secret'?
No, the bill explicitly prohibits exemptions for trade secrets or confidentiality agreements regarding this information.

Why It Matters

The bill aimed to ensure that local residents and businesses are informed about the resource demands and environmental footprint of large data centers, potentially impacting how these facilities are approved and taxed in their communities.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Transparency over Trade Secrets

The bill explicitly prioritizes public transparency over standard corporate protections like trade secrets, which is a notable regulatory stance for industrial facilities.

Connected Entities

otherEconomic Infrastructure SubcommitteeCommittee to which the bill was referredMap →
otherCommerce CommitteeCommittee to which the bill was referredMap →
otherState Affairs CommitteeCommittee to which the bill was referredMap →

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record