POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Massachusetts updates hunter harassment laws, establishing penalties up to five years in prison and $10,000 fines

Original title: An Act updating hunter harassment laws

Last action · December 18, 2025: Accompanied a study order (under JR10), see S2886Sponsor: Mike Moore

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Massachusetts bill S.1202 establishes clear protections for individuals legally harvesting fish and wildlife, prohibiting intentional interference, equipment vandalism, and unauthorized land postings. Violators face criminal penalties ranging from one to five years in prison and fines up to $10,000, while collected fines are directed to the for hunter education.

Why it matters

Hunters and anglers gain explicit statutory protections against physical interference and harassment while engaging in outdoor activities on public and private lands. At the same time, activists and residents face heightened criminal exposure, including potential felony-level prison terms for actions causing bodily injury.

Background
  • State hunter harassment laws are designed to protect licensed hunters, trappers, and anglers from intentional obstruction and interference while on public or private lands. context
  • Michael O. Moore serves in the Massachusetts Senate representing the Second Worcester district. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Hunters and anglers

Receive explicit statutory protections and civil remedies against harassment, interference, and equipment vandalism while harvesting fish and wildlife.

Directly affected

Property owners

Face restrictions against illegally posting land as closed to lawful harvesting and see trespass prohibitions reinforced around harvesting activities.

Directly affected

Law enforcement officers

Gain explicit authorization to enforce hunter harassment provisions and issue arrests for violations.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What actions are considered illegal harassment under this bill?
Illegal actions include intentionally driving or disturbing wildlife to interrupt a harvest, blocking or following hunters, using visual or physical stimuli to hinder a taking, erecting barriers on access routes, interjecting into the line of fire, tampering with equipment or property, entering private land without permission with intent to violate the law, and using to drive or harass wildlife.
Can private landowners restrict hunting on their own property?
Property owners retain rights regarding their land, but it is unlawful to post land closed or restricted to lawful harvest without authorization.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Dec 18, 2025Senate
    Accompanied a study order (under JR10), see S2886
  2. Oct 14, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 04/08/2025 from 01:00 PM-02:30 PM in A-2
  3. Apr 1, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 04/08/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-2
  4. Feb 27, 2025House
    House concurred
  5. Feb 27, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to the committee on The Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Stiffened Penalties for Harassment and Vandalism

The bill creates a tiered penalty structure scaling from $1,000 fines for basic harassment to $10,000 fines and 5-year prison terms when bodily injury occurs.

Connected Entities

Hunter Education Program, Inland Fisheries and Game Fund, The Judiciary and 2 more
OrganizationHunter Education Program“Program authorized to utilize collected fines”Map →
OrganizationInland Fisheries and Game Fund“Fund where collected fines are deposited”Map →
OrganizationThe Judiciary“Committee assigned to review the petition”Map →
Organizationsuperior court“Court granted jurisdiction to issue injunctions”Map →
PersonMike Moore“Senate sponsor of bill S.1202”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record