POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

New Jersey Bill A770 Requires Watermarks and Disclosures on Deceptive AI Media

Original title: Requires certain disclosures of intentionally deceptive audio or visual media.

Last action · January 13, 2026: Introduced, Referred to Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology CommitteeSponsor: Bailey, David, Jr.

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

New Jersey bill A770 requires producers of deceptive audio and visual media intended for internet distribution to include digital watermarks and clear verbal or written disclosures. Violating these requirements constitutes a consumer fraud violation and, under certain aggravating circumstances such as election interference or harassment, a third-degree crime.

Why it matters

Content creators and distributors face civil penalties up to $20,000 and third-degree criminal charges if they distribute deepfakes without mandated watermarks and disclosures, while residents gain the right to clear labeling on altered media.

Background
  • New Jersey's legislative process requires bills to be introduced and referred to committees for review prior to floor consideration. context
  • State consumer fraud acts allow regulatory agencies to pursue civil enforcement actions and penalties against deceptive business and commercial practices. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Content producers

Producers of digital media distributed over the internet must implement watermarks and written or verbal disclosures on altered content or face legal penalties.

Directly affected

Attorney General

The Attorney General is required to adopt administrative rules, issue advisory opinions within 30 days, establish waiver procedures, and submit five-year enforcement reports.

Directly affected

Internet users in New Jersey

Residents accessing online media receive mandated disclosures and watermarks identifying artificially altered audio and visual content.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of media are covered by Bill A770?
The bill covers any video recording, motion picture film, sound recording, electronic image, photograph, or technological representation of speech or conduct that appears authentic but was produced using technical means without consent.
Are parody shows and fictional programs required to include these watermarks?
No, the bill exempts contexts where a reasonable person would not mistake the falsified material for actual activity, such as parody shows, publications, historical reenactments, or fictionalized programming.
What are the penalties for violating the disclosure requirements?
Violations are treated as unlawful practices under the New Jersey . Additionally, omitting disclosures with specific malicious intent, such as fraud, harassment, or election interference, constitutes a .
Can content creators get guidance on whether their media complies?
Yes, the bill requires the Attorney General to establish a process for producers to seek advisory opinions, with responses required within 30 days.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, Referred to Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Bailey, David, Jr.Primary sponsorNo profile match

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Integration of AI Regulation into Consumer Fraud Statutes

The bill bridges emerging artificial intelligence challenges with established consumer fraud and criminal statutes by designating non-compliance as a violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act.

Connected Entities

State of New Jersey, General Assembly, Governor and 2 more
locationState of New Jersey“Jurisdiction enacting the legislation”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“New Jersey legislature body”Map →
PersonGovernor“Recipient of Attorney General's five-year reports”Map →
PersonDavid Bailey, Jr.“Assemblyman sponsoring Bill A770”Map →
PersonAttorney General“State official tasked with regulations and reports”Map →

Sources

Open source document

njleg.state.nj.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record